Bartoli indole synthesis

Current Organic Chemistry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 163-178

  Dalpozzo, Renato ^a   Bartoli, Giuseppe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS;

CONTINUOUS DEMAND; FLEXIBLE ROUTES; HETEROAROMATIC NITRO DERIVATIVES; INDOLE DERIVATIVES; MAGNESIUM HALIDES; NITROARENES; SIMPLE++; SOLID SUPPORTS; SUBSTITUTED INDOLES; SYNTHETIC PROCEDURES;

BIOACTIVITY;

4 (AMINOETHOXY)INDOLE DERIVATIVE; 7 FORMYLINDOLE; ACICLOVIR; AJ 9677; ALKALOID DERIVATIVE; ALKENE DERIVATIVE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; AROMATIC COMPOUND; AROMATIC NITRO COMPOUND; BETA 3 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BREQUINAR; BROMINE; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; CHLOROPEPTIN; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; DRAGMACIDIN D; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; HIPPADINE; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; MAGNESIUM SALT; NITRO DERIVATIVE; OXOASSOANINE; POLYPEPTIDE ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; PROTEASOME INHIBITOR; PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR; RACHELMYCIN; REBECCAMYCIN; TMC 95A; TRIKENTRIN A; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNINDEXED DRUG;

ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRUG SYNTHESIS; GRIGNARD REACTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OBESITY; REACTION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SUBSTITUTION REACTION;

EID: 11844254813     PISSN: 13852728     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1385272053369204     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. The name arose from the merge of the words indigo and oleum, meaning that it was isolated by treatment of the natural dye indigo with sulfuric acid / sulfuric anhydride mixture.
2. von Baeyer, A. Ann. Chem., 1866, 140, 295.
3. Fischer, E.; Jourdan, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1883, 16, 2241.
4. Bischler, A. Chem. Ber., 1892, 25, 2860.
5. Hinsberg, O. Chem. Ber., 1888, 21, 110.
6. Reissert, A. Chem. Ber., 1897, 30, 1030.
7. Nenitzescu, C. D. Bull. Soc. Chim. Romania, 1929, 11, 37.
8. Madelung, W. Chem, Ber., 1912, 45, 1128.
9. Saxton, J. E. The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, Wiley: New York, 1983; Vol. 25, Part IV.
10. For recent reviews on the de novo construction of the indole nucleus, see among others: Gribble G. W. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 1045-1075.
11. Gilchrist, T. L. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1999 2849-2866.
12. Moody, C. J. Synlett, 1994, 681-688.
13. Gribble G. W. Contemp. Org. Synth., 1994, 145-172.
14. Pindur, U.; Adam, R. J. Hetrocycl. Chem., 1988, 25, 1-8.
15. Sundberg, R. J. Indoles, Academic Press: San Diego, 1996.
16. Baccolini G. in Topics in heterocyclic systems-synthesis, reactions and properties. Soc. Chim. It. Ed.: Roma, 1996, vol. 1, 103-118.
17. Robinson, B. The Fisher Indole Synthesis, Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1982.
18. For a wide literature on functionalization of indole nucleus see among others references cited in: Hartung, C.G.; Fecher, A., Chapell, B.; Snieckus V. Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 1899-1902.
19. Ezquerra, J.; Pedregal, C.; Lamas, C.; Barluenga, J.; Perez, M.; GarciaMartin, M. A.; Gonzales, J. M. J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 5804-5812.
20. Iwao, M. Heterocycles, 1994, 38, 45-50.
21. Carrera, G. M.; Sheppard, G. S. Synlett, 1994, 93-94.
22. Somei, M.; Yamada, F.; Hamada, H.; Kawasaki, T. Heterocycles, 1989, 29, 643-648.
23. Somei, M.; Saida, Y. Heterocycles, 1985, 23 3113-3114.
24. Clark, R. D.; Repke, D. B. Heterocycles, 1984, 22, 195-221.
25. Smith, M.B.; March, J. March's Advanced Organic Chemistry Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2001, 850-853
26. Makosza, M.; Winiarski, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 282-289.
27. Bartoli, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 109-115.
28. Rajanbabu, T. V.; Reddy, G. S.; Fukunaga, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 5473-5483.
29. Ballini, R.; Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Marcantoni, E. Tetrahedron, 1988, 44, 6435-6440.
30. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Cantagalli, G.; Dalpozzo, R.; Ciminale, F. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1985, 773-779.
31. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R. Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 115-118.
32. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Grossi, L. Polar versus electron transfer pathway in the reaction of alkyl Grignard reagents with mononitroarenes. Factor affecting product distribution. In Paramagnetic Organometallic Species in Activation, Selectivity and Catalysis. Chanon, M; Juliard, M.; Poite, J.C.; eds. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 1989, 489-502.
33. Carey, F.A.; Sundberg, R.J. Advanced Organic Chemistry. Kluwer Academic Publisher, New York, 2000, Part A, 675-680.
34. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Petrini, M. Tetrahedron, 1987, 43, 4221-4226.
35. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Marcantoni, E. Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 2251-2254.
36. Barboni, L.; Bartoli, G.; Marcantoni, E.; Petrini, M.; Dalpozzo, R. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1990, 2133-2138.
37. Bartoli, G.; Palmieri, G.; Petrini, M.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R. Gazz. Chim. It., 1990, 120, 247-249.
38. Bartoli, G.; Marcantoni, E.; Petrini, M. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm., 1993, 1373-1374.
39. Dalpozzo, R.; Grossi, L.; Ganazzoli F. Tetrahedron, 1991, 41, 1091-1094.
40. Ganazzoli, F.; Dalpozzo, R.; Grossi L. Acta Cryst., 1991, C47, 1653-1655.
41. Köbrich G.; Buck, P. Chem. Ber., 1970, 103 1412-1419.
42. Sapountzis, I.; Knochel, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002 124, 9390-9391.
43. Makosza, M.; Wojciechowski, K. Heterocycles, 2001 54, 445-474.
44. Bartoli, G.; Palmieri, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R. Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30, 2129-2132.
45. Vlachou, M.; Tsotinis, A.; Kelland, L. R. Thurston, D. E. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2002, 17, 139-143.
46. Vlachou, M.; Tsotinis, A.; Kelland, L. R. Thurston, D. E. Heterocycles, 2002, 57, 129-133.
47. Miller, T. A.; Vachaspati, P.R.; Labroli, M. A.; Thompson, C.D.; Bulman, A. L.; Macdonald, T. L. Bioorg. Medicinal Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 1065-1070.
48. Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Bartoli, G.; Palmieri, G.; Petrini, M. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1991, 657-663.
49. Cadogan, J. I. G. Quart. Rev., 1968, 22, 222.
50. Bartoli, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Palmieri, G.; Marcantoni, E. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1991, 2757-2761.
51. Dobson, D. R.; Todd, A.; Gilmore, J. Synthetic Comm., 1991, 21, 611-617.
52. Dobbs, A. P.; Voyle, M.; Whitall, N. Synlett, 1999 1594-1596.
53. Dobson D.R.; Gilmore, J.; Long, D. A. Synlett, 1992 79-80.
54. Wiedenau, P.; Blechert, S. Synthetic Comm., 1997, 27, 2033-2039.
55. Carrera, G. M. jr.; Sheppard, G. S. Synlett, 1994 93-94.
56. Pirrung, M.C.; Wedel, M.; Zhao, Y. Synlett, 2002, 143-145.
57. In classical Grignard chemistry, this would constitute the normal addition, since electrophile was added to the freshly prepared organomagnesium. The inverse addition becomes the norm in the modern era when so many Grignard reagents are purchased.
58. Pirrung, M. C.; Li, Z.; Park, K.; Zhu, J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7919-7926.
59. Owa, T.; Okauchi, T.; Yoshimatsu, K.; Sugi, N. H.; Ozawa, Y.; Nagasu, T.; Koyanagi, N.; Okabe, T.; Kitoh, K.; Yoshino, H. Bioorg. Medicinal Chem. Lett., 2000, 10, 1223-1226.
60. Li, L.H.; Martins, A. Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 5987-5990.
61. Zhang, Z. X.; Yang, Z.; Meanwell, N. A.; Kadow, J. F.; Wang, T. J Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 2345-2347.
62. Russel, G. A.; Geels, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1965, 87, 122-123.
63. Knepper K.; Brase, S. Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 2829-2832.
64. Dobbs, A. P. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 638-641.
65. Dobbs, A. P. Jones, K.; Veal, K. T, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 5379-5382.
66. Wiedenau, P.; Monse, B.; Blechert, S. Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 1167-1176.
67. Banwell, M. G.; Bisset, B. D.; Busato, S.; Crowden, C. J.; Hockless, D. C. R.; Holman, J.W.; Read, R. W.; Wu, A.W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comm., 1995, 2551-2553.
68. Harrowven, D. C.; Lai, D.; Lucas, M. C. Synthesis, 1999, 1300-1302.
69. Actually, lower yields decreasing temperature badly joins with an SET mechanism, where lower temperatures should increase in-cage reactions and therefore addition over redox processes. Dobbs did not describe reaction product distribution. Other products arising from in-cage mechanism, such as anilines or diarylamines should be the by-products, which lowers yields. Nevertheless, Dobbs' results are in contrast with Harrowven's.
70. Roussi, G.; Zamora, E. G. Heterocycles, 1999, 51, 2041-2063.
71. Gurjar, M.K.; Tripathy, N. K. Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 2163-2166.