Improving employment outcomes: Perspectives of experienced counselors regarding the importance of counseling tasks

Journal of Rehabilitation

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 12-18

  Mullins, James A ^a   Roessler, Richard T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11544363297     PISSN: 00224154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ajzen, I. (1992). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 179-211.
2. Beardsley, M., & Rubin, 5. (1988). Rehabilitation service providers: An investigation of generic job tasks and knowledge. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 32 (2), 122-139.
3. Bolton, B. (1974). Three verbal interaction styles of rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 18 (1), 34-40.
4. Cook, D., & Bolton, B. (1992). Rehabilitation counselor educa tion and case performance: An independent replication. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 36 (1), 37-43.
5. Cook, D., & Bolton, B. (1993). Identifying excellence among vocational rehabilitation counselors in Arkansas: Final Report. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas, Department of Rehabilitation.
6. Erickson, B. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. Ed. pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
7. Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Mullins, J., Roessler, R., Schriner, K., Bellini, J., & Brown, P. (1997). Improving employment outcomes through quality rehabilitation counseling (QRC): Responding to the 1992 amendments. Journal of Rehabilitation 63, (4), 21-31.
11. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
12. Rehabilitation Services Administration. (1994). Information memorandum (RSA-IM-94-09). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education.
13. Rubin, S.B., Matkin, R.E., Ashley, J., Beardsley, M.M., May, V.R., Onstott, K., & Puckett, F.D. (1984). Roles and functions of certified rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 27, 199-224.
14. Schriner, K. (1996). The Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992: Initiatives and issues. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling. 27 (1), 37-41.
15. Schwab, J., & Fenoglio, J. (1992). The Texas Rehabilitation Commission system for measuring quality rehabilitation. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 23 (2), 21-25.
16. Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1991). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Szymanski, E. (1991). Relationship of level of rehabilitation counselor education to rehabilitation client outcome in the Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 35 (1), 23-37.
19. Szymanski, E., & Danek, M. (1992). The relationship of rehabilitation counselor education to rehabilitation client outcome: A replication and extension. Journal of Rehabilitation, 58 (1), 49-56.
20. Wright, G.N., Leahy, M.J., Shapson, P.R. (1987). Rehabilitation Skills Inventory: Importance of counselor competencies. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31 (2), 107-118.