Is microsoft a monopolist?

Independent Review

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 165-197

  Mckenzie, Richard B ^a,b   Shughart II, William F ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^d Independent Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11544328014     PISSN: 10861653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Armentano, Dominick T. 1990. Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure, 2nd ed. Oakland, Calif.: The Independent Institute.
2. Bank, David. 1998. Subpoenas Issued in Probe of Microsoft. Wall Street Journal, February 3, A3.
3. Bank, David, and John R. Wilke. 1998. Microsoft Probe by U.S. is Expanded to Cover Issues Related to Sun's Java. Wall Street Journal, March 17, B4.
4. Bork, Robert H. 1978. The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. New York: Basic Books.
5. _. 1998. The Most Misunderstood Antitrust Case. Wall Street Journal, May 22, A16.
6. Brinkley, Joel. 1998. U.S. and 20 States File Suits Claiming Microsoft Blocks Competition over Internet. New York Times, May 19, A1.
7. Chernow, Ron. 1998. Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. New York: Random House.
8. Cortese, Amy, Mike France, Susan Garland, Steve Hamm, and Michael J. Mendel. 1998. Scenario 2: Justice Slows the Giant with Surgical Strikes. Business Week, April 20, 120.
9. Davidson, Joe. 1993. U.S. Considers a Second Probe of Microsoft. Wall Street Journal, August 2, B8.
10. DeLong, James V. 1998. Washington vs. Microsoft: Don't Repeat IBM Debacle. Wall Street Journal, March 13, A18.
11. Director, Aaron, and Edward H. Levi. 1956. Law and the Future: Trade Regulation. Northwestern University Law Review 51: 281-317.
12. Dole, Bob. 1997. Microsoft Must Obey the Law. Los Angeles Times, November 24, B9.
13. Dowd, Maureen. 1998. Liberties: Revenge of the Nerds. New York Times, January 21, A17.
14. Eckbo, B. Espen, and Peggy Wier. 1985. Antimerger Policy under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act: A Reexamination of the Market-Power Hypothesis. Journal of Law and Economics 28 (April): 119-49.
15. Farrell, Joseph, and Garth Soloner. 1986. Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation. American Economic Review 76: 940-55.
16. Gates, Bill. 1997. Why the Justice Department is Wrong. Wall Street Journal, November 10, A22.
17. _. 1998. We're Defending Our Right to Innovate. Wall Street Journal, May 20, A14.
18. Gruley, Bryan, and John R. Wilke. 1998. U.S. Sues Microsoft over PC Browser. Wall Street Journal, October 21, A3.
19. Howard, Bill. 1998. Integration or Segregation? PC Magazine, February 24, 97.
20. Katz, Michael L., and Carl Shapiro. 1985. Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review 75: 424-40.
21. Klein, Joel I. 1998a. The Importance of Antitrust Enforcement in the New Economy. Address before the Antitrust Law Section Program of the New York State Bar Association, January 29.
22. _. 1998b. Statement by Assistant Attorney General Joel I. Klein, filing of Antitrust Suit against Microsoft. Press release, May 18. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
23. Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 1981. Market Power in Antitrust Cases. Harvard Law Review 94 (March): 937-96.
24. Lee, Dwight, and David Kreutzer. 1982. Lagged Demands and "Perverse" Response to Threatened Property Rights. Economic Inquiry 20 (October): 579-86.
25. Leibowitz, S. J., and Steven E. Margolis. 1990. The Fable of the Keys. Journal of Law and Economics 33 (April): 1-25.
26. Lopatka, John E., and William H. Page. 1995. Microsoft, Monopolization, and Network Externalities: Some Uses and Abuses of Economic Theory in Antitrust Decision Making. Antitrust Bulletin 40 (Summer): 317-70.
27. Los Angeles Times. 1997. Saying No to Microsoft. Unsigned editorial, December 15, A18.
28. Manes, Stephen. 1998. Even Microsoft's Internet Browser Defends Itself. New York Times, January 6, B11.
29. Markoff, John. 1998. Plans Offered to Cut Power of Microsoft. New York Times, April 7, Cl.
30. McAndrews, James J. 1997. Network Issues and Payment Systems. Business Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, November-December, 15-25.
31. McChesney, Fred S., and William F. Shughart II, eds. 1995. The Causes and Consequences of Antitrust: The Public-Choice Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. McGee, John S. 1958. Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Case. Journal of Law and Economics 1 (October): 137-69.
33. Microsoft: Economic and Legal Perspectives on Antitrust and Monopoly: A Roundtable Discussion with Q and A. 1998. National Press Club, February 4.
34. Miller, Michael J. 1998. Regulation: Not If but How. PC Magazine, April 21, 4.
35. Murray, Alan. 1998. It's Time Gates Placed Trust in Trustbusters. Wall Street Journal, March 9, A1.
36. PC Magazine. 1997. Pipeline. December 16, 9.
37. Postrel, Virginia. 1997. Creative Insecurity: The Complicated Truth behind the Rise of Microsoft. Reason, December, 4-6.
38. Reiffen, David, and Andrew N. Kleit. 1990. Terminal Railroad Revisited: Foreclosure of an Essential Facility or Simple Horizontal Monopoly? Journal of Law and Economics 33 (October): 19-37.
39. Rohlfs, Jeffrey. 1974. A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service. Bell Journal of Economics 5: 16-37.
40. Samuelson, Paul A. 1980. Economics, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3d ed. New York: Harper and Row.
42. Shughart, William F. II. 1990. Antitrust Policy and Interest-Group Politics, New York: Quorum Books.
43. _. 1997. The Organization of Industry. 2d ed. Houston: Dame Publications.
44. Wildstrom, Stephen H. 1998. Why I'm Rooting for Microsoft. Business Week, February 23, 30.
45. Wilke, John R. 1998. U.S. Won't Block Windows 98 Software. Wall Street Journal, March 12, A3.