Comparison of the effect of a collagen dressing and a polyurethane dressing on the healing of split thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites

Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 407-414

  Horch, Raymund E ^a,b   Stark, G Björn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collagen; Split skin donor sites; Wound dressings; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; POLYURETHAN;

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BURN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; DONOR SITE; EPITHELIZATION; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEROMA; SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 11544322043     PISSN: 02844311     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02844319850158499     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglestein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialisation in superficial wounds. J Surg Res 1983; 35: 142-148.
2. Aoyama H, Yokoo K, Kamei Y et al. A comparison of moist and dry wound healing in burn treatment. (Abstr.) Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the International Society for Burn Injuries, Paris, June 4-7, 1994: 112.
3. Attwood AI. Calcium alginate dressing accelerates split skin graft donor site healing. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 373-379.
4. Bettinger D, Humphries Y. Evaluation of calcium alginate for skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 59-61.
5. Biltz H, Kiessling M, Kreysel HW. Comparison of hydrocolloid dressing and saline gauze in the treatment of skin graft donor sites. In: Ryan TJ, ed. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress & Symposium Series No 88. 1985: 125-127.
6. Cadier MA, Clarke JA. Dermasorb versus Jelonet in patients with burns skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996; 17: 246-251.
7. Champsaur A, Amadou R, Nefzi A et al. Use of Duoderm on donor sites after skin grafting. A comparative study with Tulle-gras. In: Ryan TJ, ed. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress & Symposium Series No 88. 1985: 128-131.
8. Dover R, Otto WR, Nanchahal J et al. Toxicity testing of wound dressing materials in vitro. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48: 230-235.
9. Eloy R, Baguet J, Christe G et al. An in vitro evaluation of the hemostatic activity of topical agents. J Biomed Mater Res 1988; 22: 149-157.
10. Erasmus ME, Jonkman MF. Water vapour permeance: a meaningful measure for water vapour permeability of wound coverings. Burns 1989; 15: 371-375.
11. Faulk WP, Mathews R, Stevens PJ et al. Human amniotic membrane as an adjunct in wound healing. Lancet 1980; i: 1156-1158.
12. Feldman DL, Karpinski RHS. A prospective trial comparing biobrane, duoderm and xeroform for skin graft donor sites. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 173: 1-5.
13. Gao ZR, Hao ZQ, Li Y et al. Porcine dermal collagen as a wound dressing for skin donor sites and deep partial skin thickness burns. Burns 1992; 18: 492-496.
14. Griswold JA, Cepica T, Rossi L et al. A comparison of xeroform and skin temp dressings in the healing of skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 136-140.
15. Hansbrough JF. Use of Biobrane for extensive posterior donor site wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995; 16: 335-336.
16. Horch R, Bannasch H, Andree C et al. Fibrin glue as a carrier for cultured human keratinocytes versus cultured epidermal skin grafts in athymic mice full-thickness wounds. In: Stark GB, Horch R, Tanczos E, eds. Biological matrices and wound regeneration. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1997: 68-85.
17. Ihlberg L, Haukipuro K, Risteli L et al. Collagen synthesis in intact skin is suppressed during wound healing. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 397-403.
18. James JH, Watson ACH. The use of OpSite, a vapour permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 1975; 28: 107-110.
19. Karasek M, Charlton ME. Growth of postembryonic skin epithelial cells on collagen forms an extended network of anchoring fibrils. J Invest Dermatol 1971; 56: 205-209.
20. Lees V, Ilyas S, Reid CD. A comparison of the use of polythene sheet and Jelonet as temporary dressings for excised wounds. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 612-614.
21. Leight P, Sim E, Sorensen B. Treatment of donor sites - Duoderm or Omniderm? Burns 1989; 15: 7-12.
22. Madden MR, Finkelstein JL, Hefton JM et al. Optimal healing of donor site wounds with hydrocolloid dressings. In: Ryan TJ, ed. An environment for healing: the role of occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine International Congress & Symposium Series No 88. 1985: 133-138.
23. Madden MR, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL et al. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma 1989; 29: 924-927.
24. Porter JM. A comparative investigation of reepithelialisation of split skin graft donor areas after application of hydrocolloid and alginate dressings. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 333-337.
25. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A et al. The validation of visual analogue scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983; 17: 45-56.
26. Richmond JD, Sutherland ABA. A new approach to the problems encountered with OpSite as a donor site dressing: systemic ethamsylate. Br J Plast Surg 1986; 39: 516-518.
27. Robson MC, Krizek TJ, Koss N et al. Amniotic membranes as a temporary wound dressing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973; 136: 904-906.
28. Sawada Y, Yotsuyanagi T, Sone K. A silicone sheet dressing containing an antimicrobial agent for split thickness donor site wounds. Br J Plast Surg 1990; 43: 88-91.
29. Smith DJ, Thompson PD, Bolton LL et al. Microbiology and healing of the occluded skin-graft donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 1094-1097.
30. Tavis MJ, Harney JH, Thornton JW et al. Modified collagen membrane as a skin substitute. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 285-301.
31. Teh BT. Why do skin grafts fail? Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63: 323-332.
32. Vanstraelen P. Comparison of calcium sodium alginate (Kaltostat) and porcine xenograft (E-Z-Derm) in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Burns 1992; 18: 145-148.
33. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns 1995; 21: 243-248.
34. Wu J, Barisoni D, Armato U. An investigation into the mechanism by which human dermis does not significantly contribute to the rejection of allo-skin grafts. Burns 1995; 21: 11-16.
35. Xu W, Germain L, Goudet F et al. Permanent grafting of living skin substitutes: surgical parameters to control for successful results. J Burn Care Rehabil 1996; 17: 7-13.