A Context-Specific Interface Model for Architectural Design in the Virtual Environment

Architectural Science Review

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 105-111

  Senyapili, Burcu ^a   Özgüç, Bülent ^b  

^a Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design ^*  (Turkey)

^b BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Archirectural softwre; Computer aided design; Interface design; Modeling; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 11544290137     PISSN: 00038628     EISSN: 17589622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.1998.9697419     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. MITCHELL, W.J. and MCCULLOUGH, M., Digital Design Media. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.
2. RICHENS, P., Does Knowledge Really Help? CAD Research at the Marlin Centre. Knowledge-Based, Computer-Aided ¿Architectural Design, G. Carrara and Y.E. Kalav (Ed.s). London: Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 305-325, 1994.
3. O’CONNELL, K. R., Computer & Architecture. School Arts, 94:9 16, 1995
4. POTTER, C.D., Architectural CAD on die Desktop. Computer Graphics World. 19:625-35.1995.
5. CHARLES, C. B. and BROWN, K.M., Visualization Frontiers. Architecture, 84:12 121.1995.
6. MAULS BY, D. Inductive Task Modeling for User Interface Customization. Intelligent User Interfaces 1UI 97, J. Moore et.al. (Edi). New York: ACM, pp. 233-237. 1997.
7. SENYAPIU, Burcu. Visualization ofVirtual Architecture. Information Visualization 97. California: IEEE, pp. 260-266,1997
8. SUMNER, T. et.al., The Cognitive Ergonomics of Knowledge-Based Design Support Systems. Human Factors in Computing Systems, S. Pemberton (Ed.). New York: ACM, pp. 83-91, 1997
9. SENYAPIU, Burcu. Proposal to Improve the Use of Dynamic Simulations in Architectural Design. 4D Dynamics, A. Robertson (Ed.). Leicester, DeMontfort University, pp. 151-155, 1995.
10. SENYAPIU, Burcu. The T rue Model Concept in Computer Simulations Used in Architectural Design.6th Conference of the European Full-Scale Modeling Association (EFA), B. Martens (Ed.) Vienna: Vienna University of Technology Iris-Isis-Publicaiions OKK Editions, pp. 133-140,1996.
11. BURDEN, E., Design Simulation. London: The Mitchell Publishing Company Limited, 1988.
12. BINKLEY, T., Digital Dilemmas. Leomrdo (Digital Image-Digital Cinetna Supplemental Issue), pp. 13-19,1990.
13. MAHDAVI, A., Computational Decision Support and the Building Delivery Process: A Necessary Dialogue. Descriptive Models of Design, O. Akvn and G. Saglamer (Ed.s). Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University, 1996.
14. SENYAPIU, B. and OZGUÇ, B., Proposal for Improving Computer Aid in Interior Architectural Design. Architectural Science Review, 57A 171-179,1994.
15. EMMETT, A., A New Dynamism. Computer Graphics World, 15:6 30-33,1992.
16. MAHONEY, D.P., Walking Through Architectural Designs. Computer Graphics World. 17:6 22-30,1994.
17. KEMPFER, L. Maximizing Visualization. Computer-aided Engineering. 15:648-54,1996.
18. SINGH, G. et.al. Virtual Reality: Software and Technology. Communications of the ACM, 39:5 35,1996.
19. NEGROPONTE, N., Being Digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1995.
20. SANDERS, K., The Digital Architect. New York: J. Wiley & Sons. 1996.
21. MARK, E. Case Studies in Moviemakingand Computer-Aided Design. The Electronic Design Studio, hi. McCullough, W.J. Mitchell, and P. Purcell (Eds.). Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 393-412, 1990.
22. MARK, E., Architecture in Motion. Computers in Architecture: Tools for Design. F. Penz (Ed.). London: Longman Group UK Ltd. pp. 9-16, 1992.