The design of the PROMIS compiler

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1575, Issue , 1999, Pages 214-229

  Saito, Hideki ^a   Stavrakos, Nicholas ^a   Carroll, Steven ^a   Polychronopoulos, Constantine ^a   Nicolau, Alex ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; SEMANTICS;

APPLICATION PERFORMANCE; COMPILER DEVELOPMENT; INSTRUCTION LEVEL PARALLELISM; INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATIONS; INTERNAL REPRESENTATION; LOOP-LEVEL PARALLELISM; RETARGETABLE COMPILERS; TARGET ARCHITECTURES;

PROGRAM COMPILERS;

EID: 1142307073     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49051-7_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Robert A. Ballance, Arthur B. Maccabe, and Karl J. Ottenstein. The program dependence web: A representation supporting control-, data-, and demand-driven interpretation of imperative languages. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 257-271, June 1990
2. William Blume et al. Effective automatic parallelization with polaris. International Journal of Parallel Programming, May 1995.
3. William J Blume. Symbolic Analysis Techniques for Effective Automatic Parallelization. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1995. Also available as CSRD Technical Report No.1433.
4. Carrie Brownhill, Alex Nicolau, Steve Novack, and Constantine Polychronopoulos. Achieving multi-level parallelization. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on High Performance Computing (ISHPC), 1997. Also in LNCS No. 1336.
5. Carrie Brownhill, Alex Nicolau, Steve Novack, and Constantine Polychronopoulos. The PROMIS compiler prototype. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT), 1997.
6. Ron Cytron, Jeanne Ferrante, Barry K. Rosen, Mark N. Wegman, and F. Kenneth Zadeck. Efficiently computing static single assignment form and the control dependence graph. ACM transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 13(4):451-490, October 1991.
7. Milind Girkar, Mohammad Haghighat, Paul Grey, Hideki Saito, Nicholas Stavrakos, and Constantine Polychronopoulos. Illinois-Intel Multithreading Library: Multithreading support for iA-based multiprocessor systems. Intel Technology Journal, 1998. 1st Quarter’98.
8. Milind Girkar and Constantine D. Polychronopoulos. The hierarchical task graph as a universal intermediate representation. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 22(5):519-551, 1994.
9. Mohammad R Haghighat. Symbolic Analysis for Parallelizing Compilers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
10. Mary Hall et al. Maximizing multiprocessor performance with the SUIF compiler. IEEE Computer, December 1996.
11. Kuck and Associates, Inc. Kuck and Associates, Inc. Home Page. http://www.kai.com.
12. Steve Noback. The EVE Mutation Scheduling Compiler: Adaptive Code Generation for Advanced Microprocessors. PhD thesis, University of California at Irvine, 1997.
13. Constantine D. Polychronopoulos, Milind Girkar, Mohammad Reza Haghighat, Chia Ling Lee, Bruce Leung, and Dale Schouten. Parafrase-2: An environment for parallelizing, partitioning, synchronizing, and scheduling programs on multiprocessors. International Journal of High Speed Computing, 1(1):45-72, 1989
14. The National Compiler Infrastructure Project. The national compiler infrastructure project. http://www-suif.stanford.edu/suif/NCI, January 1998. Also at http://www.cs.virginia.edu/nci.
15. Hideki Saito. Frontend-backend integration for high-performance compilers. Technical report, Center for Supercomputing Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, December 1998. In Preparation.
16. Peng Tu. Automatic Array Privatization and Demand-Driven Symbolic Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1995. Also available as CSRD Technical Report No.1432.
17. Robert Wilson et al. SUIF: An infrastructure for research on parallelizing and optimizing compilers. Technical report, Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University.
18. Zephyr Compiler Group. Zephyr: Tools for a national compiler infrastructure. http://www.cs.virginia.edu/zephyr