Pooling of spare components between airlines

Journal of Air Transport Management

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 137-146

  Kilpi, Jani ^a   Vepsäläinen, Ari P J ^b  

^a Finnair Oyj   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Aircraft components; Airline management; Inventory pooling

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; AIRLINE INDUSTRY; ECONOMY OF SCALE; INVENTORY; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS;

EID: 1142305361     PISSN: 09696997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Airbus Industries, 2002. Initial Provisioning Training-The Mathematical Model. August 8th 2002. Airbus Provisioning Department, Hamburg.
2. Alfredsson, P., 1997. On the Optimization of Support Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
3. Alfredsson P. Eriksson B. Spares modeling of partially repairable items Communications in Dependability and Quality Management 1 1 1998 55-61
4. Baccelli F. Brémaud P. Palm Probabilities and Stationary Queues. Lecture Notes in Statistics 1987 Springer, Verlag Heidelberg
5. Cobb R. Modeling aircraft repair turntime: Simulation supports maintenance marketing efforts Journal of Air Transport Management 2 1 1995 25-32
6. Dada M. A two-echelon inventory system with priority shipments Management Science 38 8 1992 1140-1153
7. Doz Y.L. Hamel G. Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering 1998 Harvard Business School Press Boston
8. Feldman J.M. The 'Plain Vanilla Plane' Air Transport World 37 12 2000 44-48
9. Flint P. Too much of a good thing Air Transport World 32 7 1995 103-107
10. Flint P. Component MRO Stars Air Transport World 37 3 2000 73-74
11. Flint P. Trying to hold on Air Transport World 39 11 2002 60-63
12. Graves S.C. A multi-echelon inventory model for a repairable item with one-for-one replenishment Management Science 31 10 1985 1247-1256
13. Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances The Academy of Management Journal 38 1 1995 85-112
14. Hamel G. Doz Y.L. Prahalad C.K. Collaborate with your competitors-and win Harvard Business Review 89 1 1989 133-139
15. Henderson D.K. Is the holy grail in sight? Air Transport World 37 2 2000 100-102
16. Hill L. Forget function, think process Air Transport World 39 5 2002 50-53
17. Jardine A.K.S. Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability 1973 Pitmans London
18. Kleymann B. Seristö H. Levels of airline alliance membership: Balancing risks and benefits Journal of Air Transport Management 7 5 2001 303-310
19. Lee H.L. A multi-echelon inventory model for repairable items with emergency lateral transshipments Management Science 33 10 1987 1302-1316
20. Lombardo D.A. European airlines: Third-party maintenance providers Aviation Maintenance 19 7 2000 22-25
21. McDonald M. Custom tuning Air Transport World 39 3 2002 48-50
22. Mecham M. Aerospace's dot component payoff: :Collaboration' Aviation Week - Space Technology 157 7 2002 46-48
23. Mecham M. Airlines' exchange is gaining traction Aviation Week - Space Technology 157 7 2002 49-50
24. Morais R.C. Damn the torpedoes Forbes 167 11 2001 100-109
25. Palm C. Analysis of the Erlang traffic formula for busy-signal arrangements Ericsson Technics 5 1938 39-58
26. Reed A. Marketing a monitor for maintenance Air Transport World 26 9 1989 122
27. Reed A. Crashing the (third) party Air Transport World 29 11 1992 104
28. Seristö, H., 1995. Airline Performance and Costs: An Analysis of Performance Measurement and Cost Reduction in Major Airlines. Ph.D. Dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics Press, Helsinki.
29. Seristö H. Vepsäläinen A.P.J. Airline cost drivers: Cost implications of fleet, routes, and personnel policies Journal of Air Transport Management 3 1 1997 11-22
30. Takács L. Introduction to the Theory of Queues 1962 Oxford University Press New York
31. Walrand J. An Introduction to Queuing Networks 1988 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ