Another quantitative measure of bat species activity and sampling intensity considerations for the design of ultrasonic monitoring studies

Acta Chiropterologica

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 235-241

  Broders, Hugh G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anabat; Echolocation; Index; Myotis lucifugus; Research design; Sampling intensity

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; BAT; BIOACOUSTICS; ECHOLOCATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; SAMPLING;

MYOTIS; MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS;

EID: 1142305354     PISSN: 15081109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3161/001.005.0206     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BRITZKE, E. R., K. L. MURRAY, B. M. HADLEY, and L. W. ROBBINS. 1999. Measuring bat activity with the Anabat II system. Bat Research News, 40: 1-5.
2. BRODERS, H. G., C. S. FINDLAY, and L. ZHENG. In press. The effects of clutter on echolocation call structure of Myotis septentrionalis and M. lucifugus. Journal of Mammalogy.
3. HAYES, J. P. 1997. Temporal variation in activity of bats and the design of echolocation monitoring studies. Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 514-524.
4. HAYES, J. P. 2000. Assumptions and practical considerations in the design and interpretation of echolocation-monitoring studies. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 225-236.
5. HAYES, J. P., and M. D. ADAM. 1996. The influence of logging riparian areas on habitat utilization by bats in western Oregon. Pp. 228-237, in Bats and Forests Symposium (R. M. R. BARCLAY and R. M. BRIGHAM, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, 292 pp.
6. HECKER, K. R., and R. M. BRIGHAM. 1999. Does moonlight change vertical stratification of activity by forest-dwelling insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 1196-1201.
7. JUNG, T. S., I. D. THOMPSON, R. D. TITMAN, and A. P. APPLEJOHN. 1999. Habitat selection by forest bats in relation to mixedwood stand types and structure in central Ontario. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63: 1306-1319.
8. KRUSIC, R. A., and C. D. NEEFUS. 1996. Habitat associations of bat species in the White Mountains National Forest. Pp. 185-198, in Bats and Forests Symposium (R. M. R. BARCLAY and R. M. BRIGHAM, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, 292 pp.
9. KRUSIC, R. A., M. YAMASAKI, C. D. NEEFUS, and P. J. PEKINS. 1996. Bat habitat use in White Mountain National Forest. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60: 625-631.
10. LARSON, D. J., and J. P. HAYES. 2000. Variability in sensitivity of Anabat II bat detectors and a method of calibration. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 209-213.
11. MATHSOFT. 1999. S-PLUS 2000, Professional Release 2. Seattle, Washington.
12. MILLER, B. W. 2001. A method for determining relative activity of free flying bats using a new activity index for acoustic monitoring. Acta Chiropterologica, 3: 93-105.
13. SIEDMAN, V. M., and C. J. ZABEL. 2001. Bat activity along intermittent streams in northwestern California. Journal of Mammalogy, 82: 738-747.
14. SOKAL, R. R., and F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 887 pp.
15. THOMAS, D. W. 1988. The distribution of bats in different ages of douglas-fir forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 52: 619-626.
16. ZIMMERMAN, G. S., and W. E. GLANZ. 2000. Habitat use by bats in eastern Maine. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64: 1032-1040.