Role-Assignment in Open Agent Societies

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 489-496

  Dastani, Mehdi ^a   Dignum, Virginia ^a   Dignum, Frank ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Conflict; Enacting Role; Goal; Norm; Organization; Role

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INTERNET; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CONFLICT; ENACTING ROLE; GOAL; NORM; OPEN AGENT SOCIETIES; ROLE;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 1142305163     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/860575.860654     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. A. Artikis and J. Pitt. A formal model of open agent societies. In Proc. Autonomous Agents 2001, pages 192-193, 2001.
2. L. Cavedon and L. Sonenberg. On social commitments, roles and preferred goals. In Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-98), pages 80-87. IEEE Computer Society, 1998.
3. M. Dastani and L. van der Torre. What is a normative goal? In Proceedings of International Workshop on Regulated Agent-Based Social Systems: Theories and Applications (RASTA'02), AAMAS'02 Workshop, Bologna Italy, 2002.
4. C. Dellarocas and M. Klein. Civil agent societies: Tools for inventing open agent-mediated electronic marketplaces. In Proc. AMEC (at IJCAI'99), Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.
5. V. Dignum, J.J. Meyer, H. Weigand, and F. Dignum. An organizational-oriented model for agent societies. In Proc. RASTA (at AAMAS'02), Bologna, Italy, 2002.
6. M. Esteva, J. Padget, and C. Sierra. Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL-2001, Seattle, 2001.
7. M. Fasli. On commitments, roles and obligations. In B. Dunin-Keplicz and E. Nawarecki, editors, From Theory to Practice in Multi-Agent Systems, volume 2296 of LNAI, pages 93-102. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
8. K. Hindriks, F. de Boer, W. van der Hoek, and J.J. Meyer. Agent programming in 3APL. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2(4):357-401, 1999.
9. L. Padgham J. Thangarajah, M. Winikoff and K. Fischer. Avoiding resource conflicts in intelligent agents. In F. van Harmelen, editor, Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2002). IOS Press, 2002.
10. N. Jennings, K. Sycara, and M. Wooldridge. A roadmap for agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(1):7-38, 1998.
11. J. Sichman and R. Conte. On personal and role mental attitudes: A preliminary dependence-based analysis. In F. Oliveira, editor, Advances in AI, volume LNAI-1515, pages 1-10. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
12. W. Vasconcelos, J. Sabater, C. Sierra, and J. Querol. Skeleton-based agent development for electronic institutions. In Proc. UKMAS'01, 2001.
13. M. Wooldridge, N. Jennings, and D. Kinny. The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3):285-312, 2000.