Pathways to sex-based differentiation in criminal court sentencing

Criminology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 329-354

  Jeffries, Samantha ^a   Fletcher, Garth J O ^b   Newbold, Greg ^b  

^a Crime and Misconduct Commission   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Gendered processes; New Zealand; Sentencing decisions

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142301936     PISSN: 00111384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00990.x     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Allen, Hilary 1987a Rendering them harmless: The professional portrayal of women charged with serious violent crimes. In Pat Carlen and A. Worrall (eds.), Gender, Crime and Justice. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1987b Justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and Judicial Decisions. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1987c The logic of gender in psychiatric reports to the courts. In D.C. Pennington and S. Lloyd-Bostock (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
2. Allen, Hilary 1987a Rendering them harmless: The professional portrayal of women charged with serious violent crimes. In Pat Carlen and A. Worrall (eds.), Gender, Crime and Justice. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1987b Justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and Judicial Decisions. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1987c The logic of gender in psychiatric reports to the courts. In D.C. Pennington and S. Lloyd-Bostock (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
3. Allen, Hilary 1987a Rendering them harmless: The professional portrayal of women charged with serious violent crimes. In Pat Carlen and A. Worrall (eds.), Gender, Crime and Justice. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1987b Justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and Judicial Decisions. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1987c The logic of gender in psychiatric reports to the courts. In D.C. Pennington and S. Lloyd-Bostock (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
4. Bentler, Peter M. 1995 EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, Calif.: Multivariate Software, Inc. 1996 Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology 47:563-592.
5. Bentler, Peter M. 1995 EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, Calif.: Multivariate Software, Inc. 1996 Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology 47:563-592.
6. Chesney-Lind, Meda 1987 Female offenders: Paternalism reexamined. In L.L. Crites, L.L. Hepperle, and W.L. Hepperle (eds.), Women, the Courts and Equality. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. 1997 The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
7. Chesney-Lind, Meda 1987 Female offenders: Paternalism reexamined. In L.L. Crites, L.L. Hepperle, and W.L. Hepperle (eds.), Women, the Courts and Equality. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. 1997 The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
8. Cohen, Jacob and Patricia Cohen 1983 Applied Multiple Regression/Correlational Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: New Jersey.
9. Conley, John M. and William M. O'Barr 1987 Fundamentals of jurisprudence: An ethnography of judicial decision making in informal courts. North Carolina Law Review 66(3):467-507.
10. Crew, Keith B. 1991 Sex differences in criminal sentencing: Chivalry or patriarchy? Justice Quarterly 8(1):59-83.
11. Daly, Kathleen. 1987 Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review 21(2):267-290. 1989 Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime and Delinquency 35(1)136-168. 1994 Gender, Crime, and Punishment. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press
12. Daly, Kathleen. 1987 Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review 21(2):267-290. 1989 Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime and Delinquency 35(1)136-168. 1994 Gender, Crime, and Punishment. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press
13. Daly, Kathleen. 1987 Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review 21(2):267-290. 1989 Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime and Delinquency 35(1)136-168. 1994 Gender, Crime, and Punishment. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press
14. Daly, Kathleen and Rebecca L. Bordt 1994 Sex effect and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly 12(1)142-175.
15. Daly, Kathleen and Michael Tonry 1997 Gender, race, and sentencing. In Michael Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Frazier, Charles E., Wilbur Bock, and John C. Henretta 1983 The role of probation officers in determining gender differences in sentencing severity. The Sociological Quarterly 24:305-318.
17. Hagan, John 1975 The social and legal construction of criminal justice: A study of the presentencing process. Social Problems 22(5):620-637.
18. Hedderman, Carol and Mike Hough 1994 Does the Criminal Justice System Treat Men and Women Differently? London: Home Office Research and Statistics Department.
19. Heidensohn, Frances 1994 Women and crime: Questions for criminology. In P. Carlen and A. Worrall (eds), Gender, Crime and Justice. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1994 Women and Crime. 2d Ed. London: MacMillan Press.
20. Heidensohn, Frances 1994 Women and crime: Questions for criminology. In P. Carlen and A. Worrall (eds), Gender, Crime and Justice. Philadelphia: Open University Press. 1994 Women and Crime. 2d Ed. London: MacMillan Press.
21. Hodge, William C. 1991 Criminal Procedure in New Zealand. 3d Ed. Sydney, Australia: The Law Book Company.
22. James, Bev and Kay Saville-Smith 1994 Gender, Culture and Power: Challenging New Zealand's Gendered Culture. 2d Edition. Auckland, N.Z.: Oxford University Press.
23. Jeffries, Samantha 2002a Just or unjust? Problematising the gendered nature of criminal justice. Women's Studies Journal 18(1):24-41. 2002b Does gender really matter? Criminal court decision making in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology 17(1);135-149. 2001 Gender Judgments: An Investigation of Gender Differentiation in Sentencing and Remand in New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Sociology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
24. Jeffries, Samantha 2002a Just or unjust? Problematising the gendered nature of criminal justice. Women's Studies Journal 18(1):24-41. 2002b Does gender really matter? Criminal court decision making in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology 17(1);135-149. 2001 Gender Judgments: An Investigation of Gender Differentiation in Sentencing and Remand in New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Sociology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
25. Jeffries, Samantha 2002a Just or unjust? Problematising the gendered nature of criminal justice. Women's Studies Journal 18(1):24-41. 2002b Does gender really matter? Criminal court decision making in New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology 17(1);135-149. 2001 Gender Judgments: An Investigation of Gender Differentiation in Sentencing and Remand in New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Sociology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
26. Kruttschnitt, Candace and Donald E. Green 1984 The sex-sanctioning issue: Is it history? American Sociological Review 49:541-551.
27. Kruttschnitt, Candace and Daniel McCarthy 1984 Familial social control and pretrial sanctions: Does sex really matter? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 76(1):151-172.
28. Moulds, Elizabeth F. 1978 Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. Western Political Quarterly 31(3):416-430.
29. Nagel, Ilene, John Cardascia, and Catherine E. Ross 1982 Sex differences in the processing of criminal defendants. In D.K. Weisberg (ed.), Women and the Law: The Social Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Schenkman.
30. Newbold, Greg 2000 Crime In New Zealand. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
31. Phillips, Jack 1987 A Man's Country? The Image of the Pakeha Male - A History. Auckland, N.Z.: Penguin Books.
32. Raeder, Myrna S. 1993 Gender and sentencing: Single moms, battered women, and other sex-based anomalies in the gender-free world of federal sentencing guidelines. Pepperdine Law Review 20(3):905-990.
33. Reed, W.L. and J.D. Thier 1981 The presentence investigation and discretion in criminal sentencing. California Sociologist 4(2):233-245.
34. Shapland, Joanna 1987 Who controls sentencing? Influences on the sentencer. In D.C. Pennington and S. Lloyd-Bostock (eds.), The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
35. Statistics New Zealand. 1993 All About Women in New Zealand. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.
36. Steffensmeier, Darrell, John Kramer, and Cathy Streifel 1993 Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology 31(3):411-446.
37. Tjaden, Patricia G. and Claus D. Tjaden 1981 Differential treatment of the female felon: Myth or reality?' In M.Q. Warren (ed.), Comparing Female and Male Offenders. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
38. Worrall, A. 1990 Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the Criminal Justice System. London: Routledge.