p-version of the finite-element method for highly heterogeneous simulation of human bone

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 757-770

  Muller Karger C M ^a,b,d   Rank, E ^c   Cerrolaza, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD SIMÓN BOLÍVAR   (Venezuela)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA   (Venezuela)

^d Universidad Simon Bolivar   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone simulation; Finite element; Highly heterogeneous; p version; Soft surface

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYNOMIALS; PROSTHETICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BONE SIMULATION; HIGHLY HETEROGENEOUS SIMULATION; P-VERSION; SOFT SURFACES;

BONE;

EID: 1142300542     PISSN: 0168874X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-874X(03)00113-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Viceconti M., Zannoni C., Baruffaldi F., Pierotti L., Toni A., Cappello A. CT-scan data acquisition to generate biomechanical model of bone structure. Middleton J., Jones M.L., Pande G.N. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering - 2. 1998;279-287 Gordon & Breach Science Publication, The Netherlands.
2. C.M. Müller-Karger, M.E. Zeman, M. Cerrolaza, Highly heterogeneous finite element model of bone using computerized tomographies, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Rome, Italy, 2001.
3. Szabó B., Babuška I. Finite Element Method. 1991;Wiley, Inc. New York.
4. Düster A., Rank E. A p-version finite element approach for two- and three-dimensional problems of the J2 flow theory with non-linear isotropic hardening. Int. J. Num. Methods Eng. 53:2002;49-63.
5. H. Bröker, 2002 Integration von geometrischer Modellierung und Berechnung nach p-version der FEM, Lehrsthul für Bauinformatik, Technische Universität München, Ph.D. Thesis, 2002 (Published in: SHAKER VERLAG, ISBN:3-8265-6).
6. Dey S., Shephard M.S., Flaherty J.E. Geometry representation issues associated with p-version finite element computations. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Eng. 150:1997;39-55.
7. Királyfalvi B., Szabo B. Quasi-regional mapping for the p-version of the finite element method. Finite Element Anal. Des. 27:1997;85-97.
8. A. Düster, High order finite elements for three-dimensional, thin-walled nonlinear continua, Lehrstuhl für Bauinformatik, Technische Universität München, Ph.D. Thesis, 2002 (Published in: SHAKER VERLAG, ISBN: 3-8322-0189-0).
9. Rank E., Bröker H., Düster A., Krause R., Rücker M. The p-version of the finite element method for structural problems. Stein E. Error-Controlled Adaptive Finite Elements in Solid Mechanics. 2002;Wiley, New York.
10. Düster A., Rank E. The p-version of the finite element method compared to an adaptive h-version for the deformation theory of plasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190:2001;1925-1935.
11. Cann C.E., Genant H.K. Precise measurement of vertebral mineral connect using computer tomography. J. Comput. Assisted Tomography. 4(4):1980;493-500.
12. C.M. Müller-Karger, H. Bröker, E. Rank, M. Cerrolaza, 3D geometric modeling and analysis of bone using the p-version finite element method, in: Proceedings of European Congress on Computational Applied Sciences and Engineering, CD-Ram Format, Barcelona, Spain, 2000.
13. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg. 59A:1977;954-962.
14. Cowin S. Bone Mechanics. 1989;CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
15. Keyak J.H., Meagher J.M., Skinner H.B., Mote C.D. Jr. Automated three-dimensional finite element modeling of bone. a new method J. Biomed. Eng. 12:1990;389.
16. Marom S.A., Linden M.J. Computer aided stress analysis of long bones utilizing computed tomography. J. Biomech. 23(5):1990;399-404.
17. Kullmer G., Weiser J., Richar A. Construction of finite element models on the basis of computed tomography data. Middleton J., Jones M.L., Pande G.N. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering - 2. 1998;279-287 Gordon & Breach Science Publication, The Netherlands.
18. Zannoni C., Mantovani R., Viceconti M. Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures. a new method Med. Eng. Phys. 20(10):1998;735-740.
19. van Rietbergen B., Müller R., Ulrich D., Rüegsegger P., Huiskes R. Tissue stresses and strain in trabeculae of a canine proximal femur can be quantified from computer reconstructions. J. Biomech. 32:1999;165-173.