Overview of artifact reduction and removal in evoked potential and event-related potential recordings

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-17

  Ford, Martin R ^a   Sands, Stephen ^a   Lew, Henry L ^b  

^a El Paso   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROOCULOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; REVIEW;

EID: 1142297678     PISSN: 10479651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-9651(03)00125-6     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Jung T.P., Makeig S., Westerfield M., Townsend J., Courchesne E., Sejnowski T.J. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 111:2000;1745-1758.
2. de Beer N.A., van de Velde M., Cluitmans P.J. Clinical evaluation of a method for automatic detection and removal of artifacts in auditory evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Monit. 11:1995;381-391.
3. Cluitmans P.J., Jansen J.W., Beneken J.E. Artifact detection and removal during auditory evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Monit. 9:1993;112-120.
4. Fortgens C., De Bruin M.P. Removal of eye movement and ECG artifacts from the non-cephalic reference EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 56:1983;90-96.
5. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 55:1983;468-484.
6. Woestenburg J.C., Verbaten M.N., Slangen J.L. The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biol Psychol. 16:1983;127-147.
7. Grieve R., Parker P.A., Hudgins B., Englehart K. Nonlinear adaptive filtering of stimulus artifact. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 47:2000;389-395.
8. Parsa V., Parker P., Scott R. Convergence characteristics of two algorithms in non-linear stimulus artifact cancellation for electrically evoked potential enhancement. Med Biol Eng Comput. 36:1998;202-214.
9. Parsa V., Parker P.A., Scott R.N. Adaptive stimulus artifact reduction in noncortical somatosensory evoked potential studies. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 45:1998;165-179.
10. Scott R.N., McLean L., Parker P.A. Stimulus artefact in somatosensory evoked potential measurement. Med Biol Eng Comput. 35:1997;211-215.
11. McLean L., Scott R.N., Parker P.A. Stimulus artifact reduction in evoked potential measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 77:1996;1286-1292.
12. Arslan R.B., Ozdamar O., Ulgen Y. Digital subtraction method for transient evoked otoacoustic emission recording with ipsilateral noise suppression: an application to stimulus artifact reduction. Audiology. 40:2001;55-62.
13. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;695-703.
14. Swinnen A., Van Huffel S., Van Loven K., Jacobs R. Detection and multichannel SVD-based filtering of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials. Med Biol Eng Comput. 38:2000;297-305.
15. Harner R.N., Riggio S. Application of singular value decomposition to topographic analysis of flash-evoked potentials. Brain Topogr. 2:1989;91-98.
16. Pflieger M.E., Nakada T. The spatial resolving power of high-density EEG: an assessment of limits. Nakada T. Integrated human brain science: theory, method, application (music). 2000;147-191 Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
17. Tesche C.D., Uusitalo M.A., Ilmoniemi R.J., Huotilainen M., Kajola M., Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 95:1995;189-200.
18. Bradshaw L.A., Wikswo J.P. Jr. Spatial filter approach for evaluation of the surface laplacian of the electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram. Ann Biomed Eng. 29:2001;202-213.
19. Srinivasan R., Nunez P.L., Tucker D.M., Silberstein R.B., Cadusch P.J. Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline laplacians to estimate cortical potentials. Brain Topogr. 8:1996;355-366.
20. Le J., Menon V., Gevins A. Local estimate of surface laplacian derivation on a realistically shaped scalp surface and its performance on noisy data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 92:1994;433-441.
21. Vigon L., Saatchi R., Mayhew J.E., Taroyan N.A., Frisby J.P. Effect of signal length on the performance of independent component analysis when extracting the lambda wave. Med Biol Eng Comput. 40:2002;260-268.
22. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T.P., et al. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science. 295:2002;690-694.
23. Do K.A., Kirk K. Discriminant analysis of event-related potential curves using smoothed principal components. Biometrics. 55:1999;174-181.
24. Vigario R., Sarela J., Jousmaki V., Hamalainen M., Oja E. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 47:2000;589-593.
25. Pritchard W.S., Houlihan M.E., Robinson J.H. P300 and response selection: a new look using independent-components analysis. Brain Topogr. 12:1999;31-37.
26. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T.P., et al. Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. J Neurosci. 19:1999;2665-2680.
27. Zhang J. Decomposing stimulus and response component waveforms in ERP. J Neurosci Methods. 80:1998;49-63.
28. Baas J.M., Kenemans J.L., Mangun G.R. Selective attention to spatial frequency: an ERP and source localization analysis. Clin Neurophysiol. 113:2002;1840-1854.
29. Shibata T., Nishijo H., Tamura R., et al. Generators of visual evoked potentials for faces and eyes in the human brain as determined by dipole localization. Brain Topogr. 15:2002;51-63.
30. Bentley D.E., Youell P.D., Jones A.K. Anatomical localization and intra-subject reproducibility of laser evoked potential source in cingulate cortex, using a realistic head model. Clin Neurophysiol. 113:2002;1351-1356.
31. Vatta F., Bruno P., Inchingolo P. Improving lesion conductivity estimate by means of EEG source localization sensitivity to model parameter. J Clin Neurophysiol. 19:2002;1-15.
32. Bonmassar G., Purdon P.L., Jaaskelainen I.P., et al. Motion and ballistocardiogram artifact removal for interleaved recording of EEG and EPs during, MRI. Neuroimage. 16:2002;1127-1141.
33. Ford J.M., et al. The relationship between P300 amplitude and regional gray matter volumes depends upon the attentional system engaged. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 90:1994;214-228.
34. Menon V., Ford J.M., Lim K.O., Glover G.H., Pfefferbaum A. Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection. Neuroreport. 8:1997;3029-3037.
35. Schomer D.L., Bonmassar G., Lazeyras F., et al. EEG-Linked functional magnetic resonance imaging in epilepsy and cognitive neurophysiology. J Clin Neurophysiol. 17:2000;43-58.