A bold vision and a brand identity for the planning profession

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 221-232

  McClendon, Bruce W ^a  

^a Planning and growth management for Hillsborough County   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142294114     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308978016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ackerman, L., 2000. Identity is destiny, San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler.
2. Altshuler, A., 1965. The city planning process:A political analysis, Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
3. American Planning Association. 2002. Policy guide on smart growth Retrieved from http://www.planning.org/ policyguides/smartgrowth.htm
4. Barrett, C., 2001. Everyday ethics for practicing planners, Washington, DC:American Institute of Certified Planners.
5. Davis, S., 2000. Brand asset management:Driving profitable growth through your brands, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
6. Dyckman, J. W., 1978. “ Three crises of American planning ”. In Planning theory in the 1980's:A search for future directions, Edited by:Burchell, R., and Sternlieb, G., 279–295. New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
7. Friedmann, J., 1987. Planning in the public domain:From knowledge to action, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
8. Friedmann, J., 1994. The utility of non-Euclidean planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60:377–379.
9. Glazer, N., 2000. “ The public's image of the profession ”. In The profession of city planning:Changes, images, and challenges, 1950–2000, Edited by:Rodwin, L., and Sanyal, B., 224–230. New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
10. Hoch, C., 1994. What planners do:Power, politics and persuasion, Chicago:APA Planners Press.
11. Howe, D., 1994. From the book review editors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60:402
12. Kaiser, E., and Godschalk, D., 1995. Twentieth century land use planning:A stalwart family tree. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61:365–385.
13. Kent, T. J., Jr. 1990. The urban general plan, Chicago:APA Planners Press.
14. Knack, R. E., 2002. Square pegs in round holes. Planning, 68 (2):24–27.
15. Mahoney, A., 2000. Living the brand. Association Management, 52 (5):88–95.
16. Myers, D., 1997. Anchor points for planning's identification. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 6 (3):223–224.
17. Rodwin, L., and Sanyal, B., eds. 2000. The profession of city planning:Changes, images, and challenges, 1950–2000, New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
18. Sanyal, B., 2000. “ Planning's three challenges ”. In The profession of city planning:Changes, images, and challenges, 1950–2000, Edited by:Rodwin, L., and Sanyal, B., 312–333. New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
19. Schlereth, T., 1981. Burnham's plan and Moody's manual. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47:70–82.
20. So, F. S., 2000. “ Foreword ”. In Community planning:An introduction to the comprehensive plan, Edited by:Kelly, E. D., and Becker, B., xiiiWashington, DC:Island Press.
21. Stollman, I., 2000. “ Looking back, looking forward ”. In The profession of city planning:Changes, images, and challenges, 1950–2000, Edited by:Rodwin, L., and Sanyal, B., 100–108. New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
22. Teitz, M., 2000. “ Reflections and research on the U.S. experience ”. In The profession of city planning:Changes, images, and challenges, 1950–2000, Edited by:Rodwin, L., and Sanyal, B., 275–304. New Brunswick, NJ:Center for Urban Policy Research.
23. Trout, J., and Rivkin, S., 2000. Differentiate or die:Survival in our era of killer competition, New York:John Wiley & Sons.
24. Zyman, S., and Miller, S., 2000. Building brandwidth:Closing the sale online, New York:Harper Business.