Geometry and topological order in the Luttinger liquid state

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 512-518

  Kruis, H V ^a   McCulloch, I P ^a   Nussinov, Z ^a   Zaanen, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142289385     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2003-10114-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. VOIT J., Rep. Prog. Phys., 58 (1995) 977.
2. DEN NIJS M. P. M. and ROMMELSE K. J., Phys. Rev. B, 40 (1989) 4709.
3. BATISTA C. D. and ORTIZ G., Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001) 1082.
4. ZAANEN J., OSMAN O. Y., KRUIS H. V., NUSSINOV Z. and TWORZYDLO J., Philos. Mag. B, 81 (2002) 1985; NUSSINOV Z. and ZAANEN J., cond-mat/0209437; ZAANEN J. and NUSSINOV Z., cond-mat/0209441.
5. ZAANEN J., OSMAN O. Y., KRUIS H. V., NUSSINOV Z. and TWORZYDLO J., Philos. Mag. B, 81 (2002) 1985; NUSSINOV Z. and ZAANEN J., cond-mat/0209437; ZAANEN J. and NUSSINOV Z., cond-mat/0209441.
6. ZAANEN J., OSMAN O. Y., KRUIS H. V., NUSSINOV Z. and TWORZYDLO J., Philos. Mag. B, 81 (2002) 1985; NUSSINOV Z. and ZAANEN J., cond-mat/0209437; ZAANEN J. and NUSSINOV Z., cond-mat/0209441.
7. LIEB E. H. and Wu F. Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 20 (1968) 1445.
8. WOYNAROVICH F., J. Phys. C, 15 (1982) 85; 96.
9. OGATA M. and SHIBA H., Phys. Rev. B, 41 (1990) 2326.
10. This correlator was introduced first in the context of the dynamical stripes: see ZAANEN J. and VAN SAARLOOS W., Physica C, 282 (1997) 178. Similar constructions were used by WENG Z. Y., Phys. Rev. B, 50 (1994) 13837 to address phase shifts in fermion propagators in the large-U limit.
11. This correlator was introduced first in the context of the dynamical stripes: see ZAANEN J. and VAN SAARLOOS W., Physica C, 282 (1997) 178. Similar constructions were used by WENG Z. Y., Phys. Rev. B, 50 (1994) 13837 to address phase shifts in fermion propagators in the large-U limit.
12. PAROLA A. and SORELLA S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990) 1831.
13. McCULLOCH I. P. and GULÁCSI M., Europhys. Lett., 57 (2002) 852.
14. ÖSTLUND S. and ROMMER S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995) 3537.
15. SCHULZ H. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 64 (1990) 2831.
16. KRUIS H. V., MCCULLOCH I. P., NUSSINOV Z. and ZAANEN J., in preparation.
17. Despite claims to the contrary (STRONG S. P. and TALSTRA J. C., Phys. Rev. B, 59 (1999) 7362; NAKAMURA M. and VOIT J., Phys. Rev. B, 65 (2002) 153110), it follows from our results that this correlator is not an appropriate measure of hidden order.
18. Despite claims to the contrary (STRONG S. P. and TALSTRA J. C., Phys. Rev. B, 59 (1999) 7362; NAKAMURA M. and VOIT J., Phys. Rev. B, 65 (2002) 153110), it follows from our results that this correlator is not an appropriate measure of hidden order.
19. ZHANG Y., DEMLER E. and SACHDEV S., Phys. Rev. B, 66 (2002) 094501; SACHDEV S. and MORINARI T., cond-mat/0207167; SACHDEV S., cond-mat/0211027.
20. ZHANG Y., DEMLER E. and SACHDEV S., Phys. Rev. B, 66 (2002) 094501; SACHDEV S. and MORINARI T., cond-mat/0207167; SACHDEV S., cond-mat/0211027.
21. ZHANG Y., DEMLER E. and SACHDEV S., Phys. Rev. B, 66 (2002) 094501; SACHDEV S. and MORINARI T., cond-mat/0207167; SACHDEV S., cond-mat/0211027.
22. KOGUT J. B., Rev. Mod. Phys., 51 (1979) 659.
23. WHITE S. R. and SCALAPINO D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 81 (1998) 3227.