Can kinship ever inhibit the evolution of cooperation?

Ecoscience

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 460-464

  Dugatkin, Lee Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Game theory; Kinship; Sociality

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1142288717     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1997.11682424     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Axelrod, R. & L. D'Ambrosio, 1994. Annotated Bibliography on The Evolution of Cooperation. University of Michigan Publication, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
2. Axelrod, R. & W. D. Hamilton, 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211: 1390-1396.
3. Betzig, L., M. Borgerhoff-Mulder & P. Turke (ed.) 1988. Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Bonner, J. T., 1982. Evolutionary strategies and developmental constraints in cellular slime molds. American Naturalist, 119: 530-552.
5. Dugatkin, L. A., 1997. Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
6. Dugatkin, L. A. & H. K. Reeve, 1994. Behavioral ecology and 'levels of selection': Dissolving the group selection controversy. Advances in The Study of Behaviour, 23: 101-133.
7. Dugatkin, L. A. & H. K. Reeve (ed.), 1998. Game Theory and Animal Behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Fischer, E., 1988. Simultaneous hermaphroditism, Tit-for-Tat, and the evolutionary stability of social systems. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9: 119-136.
9. Giraldeau, L. A. & T. Caraco, 1993. Genetic relatedness and group size in an aggregation economy. Evolutionary Ecology, 7: 429-438.
10. Godard, R., 1993. Tit-for-tat among neighboring hooded warblers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33: 45-50.
11. Grafen, A., 1984. Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. Pages 62-84 in J. Krebs & N. Davies (ed.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. 2nd edition, Sinauer, London.
12. Hamilton, W. D., 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1-52.
13. Hamilton, W. D., 1975. Innate social attitudes in man: An approach from evolutionary genetics. Pages 133-155 in R. Fox (ed.) Biosocial Anthropology. Wiley, New York.
14. Keller, L. & H. K. Reeve, 1994. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9: 98-102.
15. Lombardo, M., 1985. Mutual restraint in tree swallows: A test of the TIT FOR TAT model of reciprocity. Science, 227: 1363-1365.
16. Mesterton-Gibbons, M. & L. A. Dugatkin, 1992. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: Evolutionary factors. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67: 267-281.
17. Pool, R., 1995. Putting game theory to the test. Science, 267: 1591-1593.
18. Reeve, H. K. & F. L. Ratnieks, 1993. Queen-queen conflicts in polygynous societies: Mutual tolerance and reproductive skew. Pages 45-86 in L. Keller (ed.). Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Seger, J., 1993. Cooperation and conflict in social insects. Pages 338-373 in J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (ed.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. 3rd edition, Blackwell, Oxford.
20. Stephens, D. W., J. Anderson & K. Benson, 1997. On the spurious occurrence of tit-for-tat in pairs of predator-approaching fish. Animal Behaviour, 53: 113-131.
21. Wilkinson, G., 1984. Reciprocal food sharing in vampire bats. Nature, 308: 181-184.
22. Wilson, D. S., 1980. The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, California.
23. Wilson, D. S., 1983. The group selection controversy: History and current status. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 14: 159-187.
24. Wilson, D. S. & L. A. Dugatkin, 1991. TIT FOR TAT versus nepotism, or, why should you be nice to your rotten brother? Evolutionary Ecology, 5: 291-299.
25. Wilson, D. S. & E. Sober, 1989. Reviving the superorganism. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 136: 337-356.
26. Wilson, E. O., 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.