Effects of lethality in naval combat models

Naval Research Logistics

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 28-43

  Armstrong, Michael J ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Combat models; Force effectiveness; Lanchester equations; Salvo equations

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FIRING (OF MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVAL WARFARE;

LANCHESTER MODELS; LETHALITY; NAVAL COMBAT MODELS; SALVO EQUATIONS;

WARSHIPS;

EID: 1142281194     PISSN: 0894069X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nav.10102     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. C.J. Ancker, A proposed foundation for a theory of combat, Naval Res Logist 42 (1995), 311-343.
2. M.J. Armstrong, One-on-one stochastic duels with suppression, Mil Oper Res 6(4) (2001), 31-42.
3. W.P. Hughes, A salvo model of warships in missile combat used to evaluate their staying power, Naval Res Logist 42 (1995), 267-289.
4. W.P. Hughes, Two effects of firepower: attrition and suppression, Military Oper Res 1(3) (1995), 27-35.
5. W.P. Hughes, Fleet tactics and coastal combat, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, 2000.
6. M.D. Johns, S.E. Pilnick, and W.P. Hughes, Heterogeneous salvo model for the navy after next, Technical Report NPS-IWJA-01-010, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 2001.
7. T.W. Lucas and J.E. McGunnigle, When is model complexity too much? Illustrating the benefits of simple models with Hughes' salvo equations, Naval Res Logist 50 (2003), 197-217.
8. J.G. Taylor, Lanchester models of warfare, Operations Research Society of America, Arlington, VA, 1983.
9. M.P. Wiper, L.I. Pettit, and K.D.S. Young, Bayesian inference for a Lanchester type combat model, Naval Res Logist 47 (2000), 541-558.