Right hemisphere superiority for subitising

Laterality

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 53-66

  Jackson, Natalie ^a   Coney, Jeffrey ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL TASK; PATTERN RECOGNITION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 1142279520     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500244000256     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1991). Is subitizing a unique numerical ability? Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 555-564.
2. Bradshaw, J. L. (1989). Hemispheric Specialization and Psychological Function. Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Bradshaw, J. L., & Nettleton, N. C. (1983). Human Cerebral Asymmetry. Hillsdale, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
4. Bruder, G. E., Quitkin, F. M., Stewart, J. W., Martin, C., Voglmaier, M. M., & Harrison, W. M. (1989). Cerebral laterality and depression: Differences in perceptual asymmetry among diagnostic subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 177-186.
5. Butterworth, B. (1999). The Mathematical Brain. London: MacMillan.
6. Cipolotti, L., Butterworth, B., & Denes, G. (1991). A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. Brain, 114, 2619-2637.
7. Coslett, H. B., & Saffran, E. (1991). Simultanagnosia: To see but not two see. Brain, 114, 1523-1545.
8. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultagnosic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 958-975.
9. Delazer, M., & Benke, T. (1997). Arithmetic facts without meaning. Cortex, 33, 697-710.
10. Joseph, R. (1990). Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioural Neurology. New York: Plenum Press.
11. Kaufman, E., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
12. Kimura, D. (1966). Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia, 4, 275-285.
13. Kimura, D., & Durnford, M. (1974). Normal studies on the function of the right hemisphere in vision. In S. J. Dimond & J. G. Beaumont (Eds.), Hemisphere Function in the Human Brain (pp. 25-47). London: Elek Science.
14. Kolb, B., & Wishaw, I. Q. (1996). Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.
15. Lezak, M. D. (1990). Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Plenum Press.
16. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1-22.
17. Nebes, R. D. (1978). Direct examination of cognitive function in the right and left hemispheres. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical Function of the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ohtani, Y. (1985). Visual field differences in an enumeration task of dots. Japanese Psychological Research, 27, 206-214.
19. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
20. Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29-46.
21. Svenson, O., & Sjoberg, K. (1983). Speeds of subitizing and counting processes in different age groups. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 142, 203-211.
22. Trick, L. M. (1992). A theory of enumeration that grows out of a general theory of vision: Subitizing, counting, and FINSTs. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The Nature and Origins of Mathematical Skills (pp. 257-299). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
23. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351.
24. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
25. Van Kleeck, M. H., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Gestalt laws of perceptual organization in an embedded figures task: Evidence for hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia, 9, 1179-1186.
26. Wagemans, J., Van Gool, L., Lamote, C., & Foster, D. H. (2000). Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 443-468.
27. Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (1967). Tachistoscopic number estimation in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 30, 468-474.
28. Wolters, G., Van Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G. J. (1987). Quantification of small numbers of dots: Subitizing or pattern recognition? American Journal of Psychology, 100, 225-237.