Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 142-146

  Ribeiro, S C ^a   Tormena, R A ^a   Giribela, C G ^a   Izzo, C R ^a   Santos, N C ^a   Pinotti, J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Infertility; Laparoscopy; Microsurgery; Pregnancy; Tubal anastomosis; Tubal sterilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NORMAL HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION;

EID: 1142273506     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00203-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jamieson D.J., Kaufman S.C., Costello C., Hillis S.D., Marchbanks P.A., Peterson H.B. The US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. A comparison of women's regret after vasectomy versus tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 99:(6):2002;1073-1079.
2. Siegler A.M., Hulka J., Peretz A. Reversibility of female sterilization. Fertil Steril. 4:(43):1985;499-510.
3. Rock J.A., Guzick D.S., Katz E.K. Tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization. Fertil Steril. 48:1987;13-17.
4. Gomel V. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: a reappraisal. Fertil Steril. 33:1980;587-590.
5. Winston R.M.L. Microsurgical tubo-cornual anastomosis for reversal of sterilization. Lancet. 1:1977;284-285.
6. Sedbon E., Bouquet de Jolinieres J., Boudouris O., Madelenat P. Tubal desterilization through exclusive laparoscopy. Hum Reprod. 4:1989;158-159.
7. Reich H., Mcglynn F., Parente C., Sekel L., Levie M. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1:1993;16-19.
8. Katz E., Donesky B.Y. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. A pilot study. J Reprod Med. 39:1994;497-499.
9. Istre O., Oslae F., Trolle B. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: reversal of sterilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 72:1993;680-681.
10. Reich H., Ribeiro S.C., Rasmussen C., Rosenberg J., Vidali A. High pressure trocar insertion. JSLS. 3:1999;45-48.
11. Koh C.H. Microsurgical laparoscopic tubal resection and anastomosis: techniques and results. Réferences en Gynécologie Obstetrique. No special, Congrès Vichy. 1995;102-104 IFS.
12. Bissonnette F., Lapensée L., Bouzayen R. Outpatient laparoscopic tubal anastomosis and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril. 72:(3):1999;549-552.
13. Yoon T.K., Sung H.R., Kang H.G., Cha S.H., Lee C.N., Cha K.Y. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril. 72:1999;1121-1126.
14. Cha S.H., Lee M.H., Kim J.H., Lee C.N., Yoon T.K., Cha K.Y. Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 8:(3):2001;348-352.
15. Chapron C., Devroey P., Dubuisson J.B., Pouly J.L., Vercellini P. ESHRE guidelines for training, accreditation and monitoring in gynecological endoscopy. Human Reprod. 12:(4):1997;867-868.
16. Holst N., Maltau J.M., Forsdahl F., Hansen L.J. Handling of tubal infertility after introduction of in vitro fertilization: changes and consequences. Fertil Steril. 55:1991;140-142.
17. Chardon C., Boulieu D., Rochet Y., Payan F., Ayzac L. Stérilité d'origine tubaire: quel traitement proposer: FIV ou chirurgie? Rev Fr Gynécol Obstét. 87:1992;355-360.
18. ESHRE (2001) The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1998. Hum Reprod. 16:(11):2001;2459-2471.
19. ASRM/SART Registry (2000) Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril. 72:2000;641-654.
20. Penzias A.S., DeCherney A.H. Is there ever a role for tubal surgery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 174:1996;1218-1223.
21. Posaci C., Camus M., Osmanagaoglu K., Devroey P. Tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: clinical options. Hum Reprod. 14:(1):1999;120-136.