Spectral characteristics and feature selection of hyperspectral remote sensing data

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 51-59

  Jiang, Xiaoguang ^a   Tang, Lingli ^a   Wang, Changyao ^b   Wang, Cheng ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS   (China)

^c NANJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; CORRELATION METHODS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

FEATURE SELECTION; OPTIMUM BAND SELECTION;

REMOTE SENSING;

IMAGE PROCESSING; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; SPECTRAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 1142269663     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0143116031000115292     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AMARSAIKHAN, D., and GANZORIG, M., 1999, Different approaches in feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Hong Kong, 22-25 November (Hong Kong: Joint Laboratory for GeoInformation Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese University of Hong Kong), pp. 434-438.
2. CHEN, S. P., TONG, Q. X., and GUO, H. D., 1998, Study on mechanism of remote sensing information. Beijing. Science Press, 139-141 (in Chinese).
3. DAI, C. D., and LEI, L. P., 1989, The spectral characteristic and optimal band combination of TM image. Chinese Remote Sensing of Environment, 4, 282-292 (in Chinese).
4. GUO, D. F., 1987, Computer Processing and Recognition of Remote Sensing Image. Beijing. Electronic Engineering Press, 251-252 (in Chinese).
5. HSU, P. H., and TSENG, Y. H., 1999, Feature extraction for hyperspectral image. Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Hong Kong, 22-25 November (Hong Kong: Joint Laboratory for GeoInformation Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese University of Hong Kong), pp. 405-410.
6. JIA, X. P., and RICHARDS, J. A., 1999, Segmented principal components transformation for efficient hyperspectral remote sensing display and classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, 538-542.
7. KAILATH, T., 1967, The divergence and Bhattacharya distance measures in signal selection. IEEE Transactions on Communication Theory, 15, 52-60.
8. KRUSE, F. A., LEFKOFF, A. B., BOARDMAN, J. W., HEIDEBRECHT, K. B., SHAPIRO, A. T., BARLOON, P. J., and GOETZ, A. F. H., 1993, The spectral image processing system (SIPS)-interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 44, 145-163,
9. MAUSEL, P. W., 1990, Optimum band selection for supervised classification of multispectral data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56, 55-60.
10. MAZER, A. S., MARTIN, M., LEE, M., and DOLOMON, J. E., 1988, Image processing software for imaging spectrometry data analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24, 201-211.
11. PRICE, J. C., 1994, Band selection procedure for multispectral scanners, Applied Optics, 33, 3281-3288.
12. SHEFFIELD, C., 1985, Selecting band combinations from multispectral data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 51, 681-687.
13. SWAIN, P. H., and DAVIS, S. M. (eds), 1978, Remote Sensing: The quantitative approach (New York: McGraw-Hill).
14. VANE, G., and GOETZ, A. F. H., 1993, Terrestrial imaging spectrometry: current status, future trends. Remote Sensing of Environment, 44, 117-126.