Monetary policy rules in practice: Evidence from Turkey

International Journal of Finance and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-38

  Berument, Hakan ^a   Tasçi, Hakan ^b  

^a BILKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Inflation targeting; Reaction function; Spread

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL BANK; CURRENCY DEVALUATION; CURRENCY MARKET; MONETARY POLICY;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 1142268778     PISSN: 10769307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.219     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bernanke B, Blinder A. 1992. The federal funds rate and the channels of monetary transmission. American Economic Review 82: 901-921.
2. Berument H. 2004. Measuring monetary policy for a small open economy. Journal of Macroeconomics, forthcoming.
3. Berument H, Malatyali K. 2000. The implicit reaction function of the Central Bank of Republic of Turkey. Applied Economics Letters 7: 425-430.
4. Clarida R, Gali J, Gertler M. 1998. Monetary policy rules in practice, some international evidence. European Economic Review 42: 1033-1067.
5. Goodfriend M. 1991. Interest rate smoothing and the conduct of monetary policy. Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy 34: 7-30.
6. Hansen L. 1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50: 1029-1054.
7. Sims C. 1992. Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts. European Economic Review 36: 975-1011.
8. Taylor JB. 1993. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy XXIX: 195-214.