Mode entanglement and entangling power in bosonic graphs

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2003, Pages

  Giorda, Paolo ^a,b   Zanardi, Paolo ^a,b,c  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b ISI FOUNDATION   (Italy)

^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTRON GAS; FERMIONS; GRAPH THEORY; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; RESONANT TUNNELING; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES; BOSONIC PARTICLES; HOPPING HAMILTONIAN; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 1142268072     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. D.P. DiVicenzo and C. Bgennet, Nature (London) 404, 247 (2000) and references therein.
2. P. Zanardi, Ch. Zalka, and L. Faoro, Phys. Rev. A 62, 030301(R) (2000).
3. G. Vidal, I. Cirac, N. Linden, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137901 (2001).
4. M.S. Leifer, L. Henderson, and N. Linden, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012306 (2003).
5. M. Nielsen et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 052301 (2003).
6. Chris D. Godsil and Gordon F. Royle, Algebraic Graph Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001).
7. G.J. Milburn et al., Phys. Rev. A 55, 4318 (1997).
8. D. Jaksch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998).
9. Z.B. Chen and Y.D. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 65, 022318 (2002).
10. R. Ionicioiu and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 66, 050301 (2002).
11. L.-M. Duan, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033619 (2002).
12. C. Simon, Phys. Rev. A 66, 052323 (2002).
13. A.P. Hines et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 013609 (2003).
14. A. Micheli, D. Jaksch, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013607 (2003).
15. L. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 030402 (2003).
16. L.-M. Duan, E. Demler, and M.D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 090402 (2003).
17. M. Greiner et al., Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
18. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077901 (2001).
19. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042101 (2002)
20. P. Zanardi and X-G. Wang, J. Phys. A 35, 7947 (2002).
21. J.R. Gittings and A.J. Fisher, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032305 (2002).
22. S. van Enk, Phys. Rev. A 67, 022303 (2003).
23. Yu Shi, Phys. Rev. A 67, 024301 (2003).
24. V. Vedral, e-print quant-ph/0302040.
25. J. Schliemann, D. Loss, and A.H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 63, 085311 (2001)
26. J. Schliemann, J.I. Cirac, M. Kus, M. Lewenstein, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. A 64, 022303 (2001).
27. R. Paskauskas and L. You, Phys. Rev. A 64, 042310 (2001).
28. Y.S. Li, B. Zeng, X.S. Liu, and G.L. Long, Phys. Rev. A 64, 054302 (2001).
29. R. Burioni et al., Europhys. Lett. 52, 251 (2000).
30. P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 67, 054301 (2003).
31. M.P.A. Fisher et al., Phys. Rev. B 40, 546 (1989).
32. p, which in turn gets equal to the mode entanglement when the number of modes per party goes to ∞ [31]. These two measures do not exclude each other but simply answer to two different questions. The aim of the present paper is to link the mode entanglement present in the systems to their physical-topological properties. The taks of studying the usability of this entanglement in quantum-information protocols i s out of the scope of the present work.
33. H.M. Wiseman and J.A. Vaccaro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 097902 (2003).