The Kuznets inverted-U hypothesis: Panel data evidence from 96 countries

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 15-16

  Thornton, John ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11344283875     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135048501750041213     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. (1992) Distribution and growth in models of imperfect capital markets, European Economic Review, 36, 603-11.
2. Anand, S. and Kanbur, S. (1993) Inequality and development: a critique, Journal of Development Studies, 41, 19-43.
3. Deininger, K. and Squire, L. (1996) A new data set measuring income inequality, World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565-91.
4. Galor, O. and Tsiddon, D. (1996) Income redistribution and growth: the Kuznets hypothesis revisited, Economica, 63, S103-S117.
5. Kuznets, S. (1955) Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.
6. Kuznets, S. (1963) Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: VIII. Distribution of income by size, Economic development and Cultural Change, XI (part II), 1-80.
7. Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1991) The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-1988, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 327-68.