Relationships among population estimation techniques: An examination for Parnassius smintheus doubleday (Papilionidae)

Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 189-195

  Matter, Stephen F ^a,b   Roland, Jens ^c  

^a Cincinnati Museum Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; POPULATION ESTIMATION;

PAPILIONIDAE; PARNASSIUS SMINTHEUS;

EID: 11344278466     PISSN: 00240966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baily, N. T. J. 1952. Improvements in the interpretation of recapture data. J. Anim. Ecol. 21:120-127.
2. Blair, R. B. 1999. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: Surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol. Appl. 9:164-170.
3. Brown, K. S. & A. V. L. Freitas. 2000. Atlantic forest butterflies: Indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32:934-956.
4. Craig, C. C. 1953. On the utilization of marked specimens in estimating populations of flying insects. Biometrika 40:170-176.
5. Edwards, W. R. & L. Eberhardt 1976. Estimating cottontail abundance from livetrapping data. J. Wildl. Manag. 31:87-96.
6. Fownes, S. F. & J. Roland. 2002. Effects of meadow suitability on female behaviour in the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus Doubleday. Ecol. Entomol. 27:457-466.
7. Gall, L. F. 1985. Measuring the size of Lepidopteran populations. J. Res. Lepid. 24:97-116.
8. Krebs, C. J. 1972. Ecology. Harper and Row, New York 694 pp.
9. Kuras, T., J. Benes, A. Celechovsky V. Vrabec & M. Konvicka. 2000. Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in North Moravia: review of present and past distribution, proposal for conservation Klapalekiana 36:93-112.
10. Mallet, J., J.T. Longino, D. Murawski, A. Murawski & A. Simpson de Gamboa. 1987. Handling effects in Heliconius: where do all the butterflies go? J. Anim. Ecol. 56:377-386.
11. Matter, S. F. & J. Roland. 2002. An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecol. Entomol. 27:308-316.
12. Nixon, C. M., W. R. Edwards, & L. Eberhardt. 1967. Estimating squirrel abundance from livetrapping data. J. Wildl. Manag. 31:96-101.
13. Pollard, E. 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 12:115-134.
14. Roland, J., N. Keyghobadi & S. Fownes. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81:1642-1653.
15. Ross, J. A., S. F. Matter & J. Roland. In press. The effects of matrix habitat and edge on the movement of the butterfLy Parnassius smintheus. Landscape Ecology.
16. Skalski, J. R. & D. S. Robson. 1992. Techniques for wildlife investigations. Academic Press, San Diego, California. 237 pp.
17. Southwood, T. R. E. 1994. Ecological Methods. 2nd ed. Chapmen and Hall, London. 524 pp.
18. Thomas, J. A. 1983. A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. Biol. Conserv. 27:195-211.
19. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 663 pp.