Effects of subsidies in Russian dairy farming

Agricultural Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 277-288

  Bezlepkina, Irina V ^a   Lansink, Alfons G J M Oude ^a   Oskam, Arie J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dairy enterprises; Liquidity constraint; Panel data; Russia; Subsidies

Indexed keywords

DAIRY FARMING; FOOD MARKET; PRICE DYNAMICS; SUBSIDY SYSTEM;

EURASIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 11344262055     PISSN: 01695150     EISSN: 15740862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0864.2005.00067.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anonymous, 1999. Poryadok vyplaty sel'khozproizvoditelyam Moskovskoi oblasti za schet sredstv oblastnogo budzheta dotacyi na produkciuy zhivotnovodstva v 1999 godu [Procedure of subsidy payment for animal production from the Moscow region budget in 1999, in Russian]. Document of the Financial Authorities of Moscow Region, Moscow.
2. Arnade C. Gopinath M., 2000. Financial constraints and output targets in Russian agricultural production. J. Int. Dev. 12, 71 84.
3. Arnade C. Trueblood M., 2002. Estimating a profit function in the presence of inefficiency: An application to Russian agriculture. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 27 ( 1 94 113.
4. Baltagi B. H., 1995. Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
5. Bezlepkina I. Oude Lansink A., 2003. Liquidity and productivity in Russian agriculture: Farm data evidence. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists (IAAE). pp. 399 408. Durban, South Africa, 16-22 August.
6. Boots M. Oude Lansink A. Peerlings J., 1997. Efficiency loss due to distortions in Dutch milk quota trade. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 24, 31 46.
7. Chambers R. G., 1988. Applied production analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Chiang A. C., 1984. Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. McGraw-Hill, London.
9. Coelli T. Rao D. S. P. Battese G. E., 1998. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 275 pp.
10. Cox T. L. Wohlgenant M. K., 1986. Prices and quality effects in cross-sectional demand analysis. Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 68, 908 919.
11. Diewert W. E. Wales T. J., 1987. Flexible functional forms and global curvature conditions. Econometrica 55 ( 1 43 68.
12. Epstein D. B., 2001. Razlichiya v finansovo-ekonomicheskom sostoyanii sel'khozpredpriyatii [Differences in financial and economic performance of agricultural enterprises, in Russian]. Mezhdunarodnyi sel'skokhozyaistvennyi zhurnal [Int. J. Agric.] 5, 21 41.
13. Goskomstat, 2000. Realizaciya sel'skohozyaistvennoi produkcii sel'khozpredpriyatiyami za 1999 (2000) god [Sales of agricultural production by agricultural enterprises in 1999 (2000), in Russian]. Moscow.
14. Goskomstat, 2002. Rossiiskyi statisticheskyi ezhegodnik [Russian Statistical Yearbook]. Moscow.
15. Greene W., 2000. Econometric Analysis ( 4th ed.). Prentice-Hall, New York.
16. Hsiao C., 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Koester U., 2003. A revival of large farms in Eastern Europe: How important are institutions? Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists (IAAE). pp. 91 102. Durban, South Africa, 16-22 August.
18. Kohli U., 1993. A symmetric normalised quadratic GNP function and the US demand for imports and supply of exports. Int. Econ. Rev. 34 ( 1 243 255.
19. Kuleshov N. I., Ed. 2000. Ekonomicheskoe regulirovanie sel'skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva v Moskovskoi oblasti [Economic regulation of agricultural production in the Moscow Region, in Russian]. Minselkhozprod, Moscow, 113 pp.
20. Lee H. Chambers R. G., 1986. Expenditure constraints and profit maximisation in US Agriculture. Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 857 886.
21. Liefert W. Swinnen J., 2002. Changes in agricultural markets in transition economies. Agricultural Economic Report 806. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
22. Minselkhoz, 2000. Instruktciya po zapolneniuy tipovykh vedomstvennykh specializirovannykh form godovoi buhgalterskoi otchetnosti organizatciyami agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Guide for completing the standard specialized annual book-keeping forms by enterprises of the agro-food sector in 2000, in Russian Ministry of Agriculture RF, Moscow, p. 135.
23. Moro D. Sckokai P., 1999. Modelling the CAP arable crop regime in Italy: Degree of decoupling and impact of Agenda 2000. Cahiers d'economie et sociologie rurales 53, 49 73.
24. Moschini G., 1988. A model of production with supply management for the Canadian agricultural sector. Amer. J. Agric. Econ. ( 70 318 329.
25. Osborne S. Trueblood M., 2001. An examination of economic efficiency of Russian crop output in the reform period. The Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association. pp. 1 27. Chicago, IL, August 5-8.
26. Osborne S. Trueblood M., 2002. Agricultural productivity and efficiency in Russia and Ukraine: Building on a decade of reform. Agricultural Economic Report 813. Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
27. Oude Lansink A. G. J. M., 2000. Productivity growth and efficiency measurement: A dual approach. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 27 ( 1 59 73.
28. Oude Lansink A. Thijssen G. J., 1998. Testing among functional forms; an extension of the generalised Box-Cox formulation. Appl. Econ. 30 ( 8 1001 1010.
29. Rao C., 1973. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. Wiley, New York.
30. Sedik D. Trueblood M. Arnade C., 1999. Corporate farm performance in Russia, 1991-1995: An efficiency analysis. J. Comp. Econ. 27 ( 3 514 533.
31. Serova E. Khramova I. Melukhina O. Tarasov A. Karlova N. Tikhonova T. Pismennaya O., 2001. Povyshenie effectivnosti ispol'zovaniya budzhetnyh sredstv v APK Rossii [Budget support of the Russian agrifood sector: Improving the efficiency, in Russian]. Agro-Food Centre Bull. 7 ( 1 2 29.
32. Shumway C. R. Gottret P. E., 1991. Numeraire choice in normalised quadratic functional choice. Appl. Econ. 23 ( 11 1597 1602.
33. Sotnikov S., 1998. Evaluating the effects of price and trade liberalisation on the technical efficiency of agricultural production in a transition economy: The case of Russia. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 25 ( 3 412 431.
34. Thijssen G. J., 1992. Supply response and input demand of Dutch dairy farms. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 19, 219 235.