Discussion of "Managers' commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 959-964

  Luft, Joan L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11244329464     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2004.tb00076.x     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Donovan, J. J., and D. J. Radosevich. 1998. The moderating role of goal commitment on the goal difficulty-performance relationship: A meta-analytic review and critical reanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (2): 308-15.
2. Hollenbeck, J. R., and H. J. Klein. 1987. Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Problems, prospects and proposals for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (2): 212-20.
3. Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and T. Randall. 2003. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (7-8): 715-42.
4. Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480-98.
5. Sherer, M., J. E. Maddux, B. Mercandante, S. Prentice-Dunn, B. Jacobs, and R. W. Rogers. 1982. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports 51: 663-71.
6. Tubbs, M. E. 1993. Commitment as a moderator of the goal-performance relation: A case for clearer construct definition. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1): 86 -97.
7. Webb, R. A. 2004. Managers' commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (4): 925-58.