Dissociation and modularity: Reflections on language and mind

Mind, Brain, and Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 87-111

  Smith, Neil ^a  

^a UCL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11244323290     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Bates, E., & Elman, J. 1996. Learning rediscovered. Science, 274, 1849-1850.
2. Bauby, J.D. (1997). The diving-bell and the butterfly. New York: Vintage Books.
3. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamson, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind: An introduction to parallel processing in networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1993). Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 177-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language learning. Language, 68, 706-755.
6. Bishop, D.V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. London: Psychology Press.
7. Bowerman, M. (1987). The "no negative evidence" problem. How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73-101). Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Carston, R. (1996). The architecture of the mind: Modularity and modularization. In D. Green and others (Eds.), Cognitive Science: An Introduction (pp. 53-83). Oxford, Blackwell.
9. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
10. Chomsky, N. (1984). Modular approaches to the study of mind. San Diego: San Diego State University Press.
11. Chomsky, N. (1991). Linguistics and cognitive science: Problems and mysteries. In A. Kasher (Ed.), The Chomskyan turn (pp. 26-53). Oxford, Blackwell.
12. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060.
14. Clahsen, H., Bartke, S., & Gollner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 14, 42-75.
15. Coltheart, M. (1999). Modularity and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 115-120.
16. Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., & Breen, N, (1997). Misidentification syndromes and cognitive neuropsychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 157-158.
17. Davies, L. (2002). Specific language impairment as principle conflict: Evidence from negation. Lingua, 112, 281-300
18. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. London; Allen Lane.
19. Elman, J. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71-99.
20. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Fodor, J. (1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition, 44, 283-296.
23. Frith, U. (1989). Autism; Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Frith, U. (1991). Asperger and his syndrome. In U. Frith (Ed,), Autism and Asperger syndrome (pp. 1-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Language and communication in autistic disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 346, 97-104.
26. Frith, U., Morton, J., & Leslie, A. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder. Trends in Neuroscience, 14, 433-438.
27. Gopnik, M. (1997). Language deficits and genetic factors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 5-9.
28. Hermelin, B. (2001). Bright splinters of the mind. London: Jessica Kinglsey Publishers.
29. Hermelin, B., & O'Connor, N. (1990). Factors and primes: A specific numerical ability. Psychological Medicine, 20, 163-169.
30. Inhelder, B. (1980). Language and knowledge in a cons true tivist framework. In M. Piattelli- Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 132-141). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Joanisse, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1998). Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 240-247.
32. Jusczyk, P. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press.
33. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Karmiloff-Smith, A., Klima, E., Grant, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Is there a social module? Language, face processing, and theory of mind in individuals with Williams syndrome, Journal of Cognzlive Neuroscience, 7, 196-208.
35. Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of "Theory of Mind." Psychological Review, 94, 412-426.
36. Levy, Y, & Kave, G. (1999). Language breakdown and linguistic theory: A tutorial overview. Lingua, 107, 95-143.
37. Marcus, G. (2001), The algebraic mind: Reflections on connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Morgan, G., Smith, N. V, Tsimpli, I.M., & Woll, B. (2002). Language against the odds: The learning of British Sign Language by a polyglot savant. Journal of Linguistics, 38, 1-41.
39. O'Connor, N, &. Hermelin, B. (1984). Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Maths or memory? Psychological Medicine, 14, 801-806.
40. O'Connor, N., & Hermelin, B, (1991). A specific linguistic ability. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 95, 673-680.
41. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1968). The psychology of the child. London: Routledge.
42. Quine, W. V O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Sieratzki, J.S., & Woll, B, (1998). Toddling into language: Precocious language development in motorimpaired children with spinal muscular atrophy. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield, & H, Walsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, (Vol. 2, pp. 684-694). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
44. Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. Ferguson & D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175-208). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
45. Sloboda, J. (1985). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Smith, N. V (1994). Review article on A. Karmiloff-Smith (1992). European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 29, 95-105.
47. Smith, N.V. (1997). Structural eccentricities. Glot International, 2, 8. Reprinted in Smith, 2002, pp. 110-115.
48. Smith, N. V (1998). Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition. Glot International, 3, 7. Reprinted in Smith, 2002, pp. 95-99.
49. Smith, N.V. (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Smith, N.V. (2002). Language, bananas and bonobos. Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Smith, N.V. (in press). Wonder. GlotInternational, 6.
52. Smith, N.V. & Tsimpli, I.-M. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language-learning and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Smith, N.V. & Tsimpli, I.-M. (1997). Reply to Bates: Review of Smith & Tsimpli, 1995. The International Journal of Bilmgualism, 2, 180-186.
54. Smith, N.V., Tsimpli, I.-M., & Ouhalla, J. (1993). Learning the impossible: The acquisition of possible and impossible languages by a polyglot savant. Lingua, 91, 279-347.
55. Soja, N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning; Object terms and substance terms. Cognition, 38, 179-211.
56. Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. Hirschfeld & S.S. Geltnan (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 39-67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Loose talk. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, NSLXXXVI. 153-171
58. Tallal, P. (1990). Fine-grained discrimination deficits in language learning impaired children are specific neither to the auditory modality nor to speech perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 616-617.
59. Treffert, D.A. (1989). Extraordinary people. London: Black Swan.
60. Tsimpli, I.-M., & Smith, N.V. (1991). Second language learning: Evidence from a polyglot savant. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 171-183.
61. Tsimpli, I.-M., & Smith, N.V. (1998). Modules and quasi-modules: language and theory of mind in a polyglot savant. Learning and individual differences, 10, 193-215.
62. van der Lely, H.K.J. (1996). Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua, 98, 243-272.
63. van der Lely, H.K.J. (1997). Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 75-107.
64. van der Lely, H.K.J. (1998). SLI in children: Movement, economy and deficits in the computational syntactic system. Language Acquisition, 72, 161-192.
65. van der Lely, H.K.J., & Stollwerck, L. (1997). Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition, 62, 245-290.
66. Wexler, K. (1998). The unique checking constraint and the extended projection principle as the explanation for the optional infinitive stage: very early parameter-setting, maturational mechanisms and variation in grammatical development. Lingua, 106, 23-79.
67. Wynn, K. (1998). Psychological foundations of number: Numerical competence in human infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 296-303.