Injection and strong current channeling in organic disordered media [5]

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 16, 2004, Pages 1-4

  Tutiš, Eduard ^a   Batistić, Ivo ^b   Berner, Detlef ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (Croatia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

^c CFG Microelectronic   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENSITY; ELECTRONICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR PHYSICS;

EID: 11244320490     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.161202     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. C. W. Tang and A. Van. Slyke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 913 (1987).
2. R. H. Friend, R. W. Gymer, A. B. Holmes, J. H. Burroughes, R. N. Marks, C. Taliani, D. D. C. Bradley, D. A. Dos Santos, J. L. Brédas, M. Lögdlund, and W. R. Salaneck, Nature (London) 397, 121 (1999) and references therein.
3. S. Naka, H. Okada, H. Onnagawa, Y. Yamaguchi, and T. Tsutsui, Synth. Met. 111-112, 331 (2000).
4. D. H. Dunlap, P. E. Parris, and V. M. Kenkre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 542 (1996).
5. Yu. N. Gartstein and E. M. Conwell, Chem. Phys. Lett. 245, 351 (1995).
6. Yu. N. Gartstein and E. M. Conwell, Chem. Phys. Lett. 255, 93 (1996)
7. U. Wolf, V. I. Arkhipov, and H. Bässler, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7507 (1999).
8. M. A. Saldo and S. R. Forrest, Phys. Rev. B 64, 085201 (2001).
9. S. V. Novikov, D. H. Dunlap, V. M. Kenkre, P. E. Parris, and A. V. Vannikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4472 (1998).
10. S. V. Novikov and A. V. Vannikov, JETP 79, 482 (1994).
11. R. H. Young, Philos. Mag. B 72, 435 (1995).
12. We also considered the case when the effect of the metal surface is treated by imposing "image dipoles" behind the surface. This reduces the strength of disorder in the first two or three layers and affects the results at very high fields when the Schottky barrier comes that close to the metal surface. However, even then, the injection inhomogeneity is much more pronounced for the system with correlated disorder and the injection current is bigger again.
13. P. R. Emtage and J. J. O'Dwyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 356 (1966).
14. This also allows for a much more efficient 3D numerical method, inspired by the ID treatment explained above. The 3D method uses an iteration procedure to obtain the charge distribution in the first sheet (monolayer) from an arbitrary current distribution at the exiting electrode. By inverting the result one then finds the current distribution throughout the system from the charge distribution in the first monolayer. Further details of this algorithm will be published separately.
15. Apart from standards libraries, we used the SuperLU algorithm (http://crd.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/14/).
16. D. Berner, E. Tutiš, W. Leo, M. Schaer, and L. Zuppiroli, Proc. SPIE 5464, 330 (2004).
17. S. V. Novikov and A. V. Vannikov, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 384, 55 (2002).
18. S. A. Van Slyke, C. H. Chen, and C. W. Tang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2160 (1996).
19. A. B. Chwang, R. C. Kwong, and J. J. Brown, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 725 (2002).
20. E. Tutiš, M. N. Bussac, B. Masenelli, M. Carrard, and L. Zuppiroli, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 430 (2001).
21. H. Houili, E. Tutiš, H. Lutjens, M. N. Bussac, and L. Zuppiroli, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156, 108 (2003).