Transport of interacting electrons in arrays of quantum dots and diffusive wires [96]

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 16, 2004, Pages 1-12

  Golubev, Dmitri S ^a,c   Zaikin, Andrei D ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c LEBEDEV PHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL DERIVATIVE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONDUCTOR; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NOISE; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY;

EID: 11244317160     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.165423     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D. S. Golubev and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4887 (2001).
2. A. V. Galaktionov, D. S. Golubev, and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. B 68, 085317 (2003); 68, 235333 (2003).
3. A. V. Galaktionov, D. S. Golubev, and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. B 68, 085317 (2003); 68, 235333 (2003).
4. M. Kindermann and Yu. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 136802 (2003).
5. D. A. Bagrets and Yu. V. Nazarov, cond-mat/0304339 (unpublished).
6. L. S. Levitov, H. Lee, and G. B. Lesovik, J. Math. Phys. 37, 4845 (1996).
7. Ya. M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).
8. D. S. Golubev and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Lett. A 169, 475 (1992); Sh. Farhangfar, R. S. Poikolainen, J. P. Pekola, D. S. Golubev, and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. B 63, 075309 (2001).
9. D. S. Golubev and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Lett. A 169, 475 (1992); Sh. Farhangfar, R. S. Poikolainen, J. P. Pekola, D. S. Golubev, and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. B 63, 075309 (2001).
10. D. S. Golubev and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075318 (2004).
11. P. Schwab and R. Raimondi, Eur. Phys. J. B 30, 5 (2002).
12. I. S. Beloborodov, K. B. Efetov, A. V. Lopatin, and V. M. Vinokur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246801. (2003).
13. B. L. Altshuler and A. G. Aronov, in Electron-Electron Interaction in Disordered Systems, edited by A. L. Efros and M. Pollak (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).
14. M. J. M. de Jong and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 51, 16 867 (1995).
15. S. Oberholzer, E. V. Sukhorukov, C. Strunk, and C. Schönenberger, Phys. Rev. B 66, 233304 (2002).
16. G. Göppert and H. Grabert, Eur. Phys. J. B 16, 687 (2000).
17. A. Kamenev and A. Andreev, Phys. Rev. B 60, 2218 (1999).
18. G. Schön and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rep. 198, 237 (1990).
19. D. S. Golubev and A. D. Zaikin, Phys. Rev. B 59, 9195 (1999).
20. Note, that the parametrization (30) is not identical to that proposed, e.g., in Ref. 15. It is straightforward to demonstrate that the final result does not depend on the choice of the parametrization of the Q field. The form (30) is convenient as it allows to easily identify the noise terms within our Langevin equation analysis.
21. ∑ ≫ 1 is always sufficient. However, the latter condition is actually too stringent at not too low temperatures and voltages.
22. In order to avoid misunderstandings we would like to emphasize again that our present approach accounts for the interaction correction to the I-V curve and is not meant to describe weak localization effects and interaction-induced dephasing (Refs. 11 and 17) which we do not address in this work.
23. eff ∼ 1/T.
24. D, where a is the size of a single quantum dot.