Current challenges for intermodal freight transport and logistics in Europe and the United States

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1873, 2004, Pages 70-78

  Zografos, Konstantinos G ^a   Regan, Amelia C ^b  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MARKETING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CARGO SECURITY PROCESS; E-BUSINESS; LOGISTICAL SERVICES; TRILATERAL LOGISTICS PROJECT (TRILOG);

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 11244312939     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1873-09     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Diagnosis Report: Identifying the Main Policy, Business, Technical and Social Issues Underlying the Evolution of Intermodal Transport: Passengers and Freight. TFI/004/96. Task Force Transport Intermodality, Luxembourg, Mar. 1996.
2. Task Force Transport Intermodality, Final Report: Prioritisation of RTD Tasks. 1997. www.cordis.lu/transport/src/contab.htm.
3. Special Report 240: ISTEA and Intermodal Planning. Concept, Practice, Vision: Proceedings of a Conference. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
4. EU/US Dialogue on Intermodal Freight Transport. European Commission. Directorate General TREN and U.S. Department of Transportation, Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
5. Freight Transportation: The European Market, Report FHWA-PL-02-009. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
6. Public Policy Issues in Global Freight Logistics. Proc., OECD TRILOG Plenary Symposium, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1998.
7. Cooper, M. C. Logistics in the Decade of the 1990s. In The Logistics Handbook (J. F. Roberson and W. C. Copacino, Andersen Consulting, eds.), Free Press, Inc., New York, 1994, pp. 35-53.
8. Coyle, J. J. Future Manufacturing, Markets, and Logistics Needs. Proc., International Symposium on Motor Carrier Transportation, Williamsburg, Va., 1993, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1994.
9. Cortright, J. How Will Changes in Information Technology Change the Demand for Freight Transportation and Industrial Location? Presented at Roundtable Conference on E-Freight: Metropolitan Implications, Portland, Ore., 2001.
10. Meyer, M. D. Delivering the Future: E-Freight. www.intermodal.org/meyerpaper.html.
11. COST 310: Freight Transport Logistics. Final Report (M. Chapuis, F. Fabre, and I. Zubero, eds.), European Commission, DO VII, Luxembourg, 1993.
12. White Paper of European Transport Policy to the Year 2010: Time to Make Choices. European Commission, Luxembourg, June 2001.
13. Report on the Fourth Forum on Intermodal Freight Transport in Europe and the United States. European Commission, DG Energy and Transport and U.S. Department of Transportation, Luxembourg, 2001.
14. O'Sullivan, D. Logistics in Europe: The Vision and the Reality. Logistics Information Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1997, pp. 14-19.
15. ELA and A. T. Kearney, Inc. Insight to Impact. Results of the Fourth Quinquennial European Logistics Study. European Association of Logistics, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
16. Demkes, R. TRILOG-Europe End Report. TNO Inro. TNO-Netherlands, Delft, 1999.
17. Analysis of Trends in Supply Chain Management and Logistics. SULOGTRA Project. European Commission, Directorate General TREN, Brussels, Belgium, 2000.
18. Zografos, K. G., and I. M. Giannouli. Development and Application of a Methodological Framework for Assessing SCM Trends. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2001.
19. Zografos, K. G., and I. M. Giannouli. Emerging Trends in Logistics and Their Impact on Freight Transportation Systems: A European Perspective. In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1790, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2002, pp. 36-44.
20. The E-Economy in Europe: Its Potential Impact on EU Enterprises and Policies. E-Economy Conference, Brussels, Belgium, March 1-2, 2001.
21. Burghardt, G. The New E-Economy. Conference on Global Business in a Networked Economy: Lessons Learned and Future Trends, New Haven, Conn., June 22, 2001.
22. Transport Topics. Stackable Containers Grab Market Share from Trailers. Nov. 22, 2002. www.ttnews.com.
23. Stagl, J. Pitching In: UP's Counting on Its Mechanical, Engineering and Signal Heads to Make Plays for the Railroad's Process-Change Team. Progressive Railroading, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2003, pp. 29-38.
24. Jensen, M., M. Williamson, R. Sanchez, A. Newton, C. Mitchell, and M. Hallenbeck. WSDOT Intermodal Data Linkages, Freight ITS Operational Test Evaluation Final Report. Final Report to FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
25. Zografos, K. G., and I. M. Giannouli. A Methodological Framework for Introducing ITS Applications for Improving the Performance of Intermodal Freight Terminals. Proc., 5th World Congress on ITS, Seoul, Korea, 1998.
26. Anderson, S., J. Allen, and M. Browne. Urban Logistics: How Can It Meet Policy Makers' Sustainability Objectives? Presented at STELLA Thematic Network Seminar, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, May 26-27, 2003.
27. Taniguchi, E., R. G. Thompson, T. Yamada, and R. van Duin. City Logistics, Network Modelling and Intelligent Transport Systems. Pergamon, New York, 2001.
28. Taniguchi, E., and R. G. Thompson. City Logistics II. Proc., 2nd International Conference on City Logistics, Kyoto, Japan, 2001. www.citylogistics.org.
29. Weisbrod, R. E., E. Swiger, G. Muller, F. M. Rugg, and M. K. Murphy. Global Freight Villages: A Solution to the Urban Freight Dilemma. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
30. Transportation Research Circular, E-C048: Freight Transportation Research Needs Statements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2002.
31. Regan, A. C., and T. Golob. Trucking Industry Demand for Shared Use Freight Terminals. Transportation, 2004, in press.
32. Park, M. Y., and A. C. Reagan. Improving Urban Express Delivery Services. Working Paper. Institute of Transportation Systems, University of California, Irvine, 2003.
33. Feitler, J. N., T. M. Corsi, and C. M. Grimm. Measuring Firm Strategic Change in the Regulated and Deregulated Motor Carrier Industry: An 18-Year Evaluation. Transportation Research E, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1997, pp. 159-169.
34. Gardner, W., and L. Johnson. Third-Party Logistics. In The Logistics Handbook (J. F. Roberson and W. C. Copacino, Andersen Consulting, eds.), Free Press Inc., New York, 1994, pp. 835-857.
35. Razzaque, M. A., and C. C. Sheng. Outsourcing of Logistics Functions: A Literature Review. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1998, pp. 89-107.
36. Foster, T. A. In Europe, 3PLs Rule. Logistics Management and Distribution Report, 1999. www.manufacturing.net/magazine/logistic/archives/1999/log1001.99/804.html.
37. Brown, T. Freight Commodity Brokers and General Commodity Trucking. Transportation Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1984, pp. 4-14.
38. Sheffi, Y. Third-Party Logistics: Present and Future Prospects. Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1990, pp. 27-39.
39. Murphy, P. R., and R. F. Poist. Third-Party Logistics Usage: An Assessment of Propositions Based on Previous Research. Transportation Journal, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1998, pp. 26-35.
40. Lieb, R. C., and L. Peluso. The Use of Third Party Logistics Services by Large American Manufacturers: The 1999 Survey. Working Paper. Northeastern University, Boston, Mass., 2000.
41. Lieb, R. C., and Peluso, L. CEO Perspectives on the Current Status and Future Prospects of the Third Party Logistics Industry in the United States. Working Paper. Northeastern University, Boston, Mass., 2000.
42. Lieb, R. C., and H. L. Randall. CEO Perspectives on the Current Status and Future Prospects of the Third-Party Logistics Industry in the United States. Transportation Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1997, pp. 28-41.
43. Leahy, S. E., P. R. Murphy, and R. F. Poist. Determinants of Successful Logistical Relationships: A Third-Party Provider Perspective. Transportation Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1995, pp. 5-13.
44. Sankaran, J., and Z. Charman. An Inductive Empirical Investigation into Third Party Logistics Contracts. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Sydney, Australia, 2000.
45. Badolato, E. D. Cargo Security: High-Tech Protection, High-Tech Threats. TR News, No. 211, Nov.-Dec. 2000, pp. 14-17.
46. Special Report 274: Cybersecurity of Freight Information Systems - A Scoping Study. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003.
47. Cho, A. Containing Container Risks and Connecting Modes: Intermodal Infrastructure Planners Take on Security. Engineering News-Record, Vol. 250, No. 9, 2003, pp. 19-20.
48. Lewis, B. M., A. L. Erera, and C. C. White, III. Optimization Approaches for Efficient Container Security Operations at Transshipment Seaports. Nov. 2002. www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov//JPODOCS/REPTS_TE/13781.html.
49. Lewis, B., A. Erera, and C. White. Port Security and Efficiency: A U.S. Perspective. Port of Singapore Magazine, July 2002, pp. 6-9.
50. Implications, Future Developments, Needs and Roadmap for Implementation of Emerging Supply Chain Management and Logistics Concepts. BPR Logistics Project. European Commission, DG INFSO, Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
51. Abbugao, M. Terrorist Threat Shakes Up World's Maritime Industry. Jakarta Post. 2003. www.isye.gatech.edu/setra/reports/jakarta27 jan03.jpg.