Spurred anoda (anoda cristata) competition in narrow- And wide-row soybean (Glycine max)

Weed Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 446-451

  Puricelli, Eduardo C ^c   Faccini, Delma E ^c   Orioli, Gustavo A ^c   Sabbatini, Mario R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Aggressivity; Competition; Crop and weed biomass; Row spacing; Weed density

Indexed keywords

ANODA CRISTATA; GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 11244312897     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0446:SAACCI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bauer, T. A., D. A. Mortensen, G. A. Wicks, T. A. Hayden, and R. A. Martin. 1991. Environmental variability associated with economic thresholds for soybeans. Weed Sci. 39:564-569.
2. Buhler, D. D., J. L. Gunsolus, and D. F. Ralston. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced bentazon rates and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41:447-453.
3. Crotser, M. P. and W. W. Witt. 2000. Effect of Glycine max canopy characteristics, G. max interference, and weed-free period on Solanum ptycan- thum growth. Weed Sci. 48:20-26.
4. Defelice, M. S., W. B. Brown, R. J. Aldrich, B. D. Sims, D. T. Judy, and D. R. Guethle. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with below- label rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365-374.
5. Deibert, E. J. 1989. Soybean cultivar response to reduced tillage systems in northern dryland areas. Agron. J. 81:672-676.
6. Elmore, R. W. 1987. Soybean cultivar response to tillage systems. Agron. J. 77:459-465.
7. Hamill, A. S., J. Zhang, and C. Swanton. 1994. Reducing herbicide use for weed control in soybean (Glycine max) grown in two soil types in southwestern Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75:283-292.
8. Johnson, G. A., T. H. Hoverstad, and R. E. Greenwald. 1997. Integrated weed management using narrow row crop spacing, herbicides and cultivation. Agron. J. 90:40-46.
9. Kropff, M. J. and L.A.P. Lotz. 1993. Empirical models for crop-weed competition. In M. J. Kropff and H. H. van Larr, eds. Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. U.K.: CAB International. Pp. 9-24.
10. Leguizamón, E., D. Faccini, L. Nisensohn, et al. 1994. Funciones de daño y cálculos de pérdidas por malezas en el cultivo de soja. Informe técnico No. 296. INTA Pergamino. Ed. R. Parisi. R. 19 p.
11. Leiva, P. and N. Ianone. 1994. Soja: El problema de las malezas y su control. Segunda parte: Presencia y evolución de las principales especies. Carpeta de Producción Vegetal. Area de Agronomiá. EEA Pergamino. ISSN 0326-2354. Información No. 119. Pp. 1-4.
12. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, and B. E. Johnson. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J. 90:787-792.
13. Lutman, P.J.W., R. Risiott, and H. P. Ostermann. 1996. Investigations into alternative methods to predict the competitive effect of weeds on crop yields. Weed Sci. 44:290-297.
14. Mattioli, A. J. 1984. Control de malezas en el cultivo de soja. Actas de la X reunión Argentina sobre la maleza y su control. Tucumán. Argentina 1: C-53-C-70.
15. McGilchrist, C. A. and B. R. Trenbath. 1971. A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27:659-671.
16. Paolini, R., S. Del Puglia, M. Principi, O. Barcelona, and E. Riccardi. 1998. Competition between safflower and weeds as influenced by crop genotype and sowing date. Weed Res. 38:247-255.
17. Paolini, R., M. Principi, R. J. Froud-Williams, S. Del Puglia, and E. Biancardi. 1999. Competition between sugarbeet and Sinapis arvensis and Cheno- podium album, as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Res. 39:425-440.
18. Prostko, E. P. and J. A. Meade. 1993. Reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in conventional soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:541-545.
19. Shaw, D. R., A. Rankins Jr., and J. T. Ruscoe. 1997. Sicklepod (Senna ob- tusifolia) interference with soybean (Glycine max) cultivars following herbicide treatments. Weed Technol. 11:510-514.
20. Snaydon, R. W. 1991. Replacement or additive designs for competition studies? J. Appl. Ecol. 28:930-946.
21. Snaydon, R. W. and E. H. Satorre. 1989. Bivariate diagrams for plant competition data: modifications and interpretations. J. Appl. Ecol. 26:1043-1057.
22. Spitters, C.J.T. and J. P. Van der Bergh. 1982. Competition between crop and weeds: a system approach. In M. Holzner and W. Numata, eds. Biology and Ecology of Weeds. The Hague: Junk Publishers. Pp. 137-148.
23. Steckel, L. E., M. S. Defelice, and B. D. Sims. 1990. Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:541-545.
24. Swanton, C. J., S. Weaver, P. Cowan, R. Van Acker, W. Deen, and A. Shreshta. 1999. Weed thresholds: theory and applicability. J. Crop Prod. 2:9-29.
25. Vitta, J. I. and E. Satorre. 1999. Validation ofa weed: crop competition model. Weed Res. 39:259-269.
26. Vitta, J., D. Tuesca, E. Puricelli, L. Nisensohn, D. Faccini, y G. Ferrari. 2000. Consideraciones acerca del manejo de malezas en cultivares de soja re- sistentes a glifosato. UNR Editora. 15 p.
27. Wax, L. M., W. R. Nave, and R. L. Cooper. 1997. Weed control in narrow and wide row soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7:365-369.
28. Wells, R. 1993. Dynamics ofsoybean growth in variable row spacings. Agron. J. 85:44-48.
29. Wit, C. T. de. 1960. On competition. Verslagen van Landbouwkundige On- derzoekingen, 66:1-82.