The rehabilitation results of hemiplegic patients

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 385-389

  Doǧan, Asuman ^a,b   Nakipog̈lu, Güldal F ^a   Doǧan Aslan, Meryem ^a   Kaya, Ayşe Z ^a   Özgirgin, Neşe ^a  

^a Ankara Phys Med Rehab Educ R H   (Turkey)

^b Kent Koop Mahallesi   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Barthel Index; Functional Ambulation Scale; Hemiplegia; Rehabilitation outcome

Indexed keywords

AMBULANCES; DISEASES; HOSPITALS; PATIENT MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

AMBULATION; BARTHEL INDEX (BI); FUNCTIONAL AMBULATION SCALE (FAS); HEMIPLEGIC PATIENTS;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL AMBULATION SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPLEGIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PATIENT CARE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE;

EID: 11244300995     PISSN: 13000144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams RD, Victor M. Principles of Neurology 4th Ed. Mc Graw-Hill Company. New York 1989, pp:617-92.
2. Garison SJ, Rolak LA. Rehabilitation of stroke patients. Rehabilitation Medicine:Principles and Practise. Ed. DeLisa J.A. 2nd Ed. JB Lippincott Company. Philadelphia 1993, pp: 801-24.
3. Henry JM, Bernet J et al. Stroke Pathophysiology Diagnosis and Management. 2nd Ed. Churcill living stone. New York 1992, pp: 859-66.
4. Oǧul E. Uludaǧ Üniversitesi Temel ve Klinik Nöroloji. Bursa 1996, pp: 105-45
5. Dinçer K. İnme. Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon. Eds. Beyazova M, Gökçe-Kutsal Y. Güneş Tip Kitabevi. Ankara 2000, pp: 1936-50.
6. Özcan O. Hemipleji Rehabilitasyonu. Tibbi Rehabilitasyon. Ed Oǧuz H. Nobel Tip Kitabevi. Ankara 1995, pp: 388-390.
7. Law M, Lextts L. A Critical review of scales of daily living. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 43: 522-8, 1989.
8. Shah S. Inprasie of the Brometric and psychometric qualities of the Barthel index. Physiotherapy 80: 769-79, 1994.
9. Carod Artal J, Egido JA et al. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke. Stroke 31: 2995-3006, 2000.
10. Dambovy ML, Sandok BA et al. Rehabilitation for stroke. Advances in Neurology 47: 265-76, 1988.
11. Engström G, Jerntorp I et al. Geographic distribution of stroke incidence within an urban population. Stroke 32: 1098-1107, 2001.
12. Özgirgin N. Hemiplejide Fonksiyonel Rehabilitasyon. Gazi Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dali Hemipleji ve Rehabilitasyon Sempozyumu Kitabi. Gazi Üniversitesi. Ankara 1999, pp: 61-78.
13. Holden MK, Kathleen MG et al. Clinical gait assesment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 66: 1530-9, 1986.
14. Roth EJ, Harvey RL. Rehabilitation of Stroke Syndromes. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Ed. Braddom RL. W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Montreal, Sydney, Tokyo 1996, pp: 1053-87
15. Aydin ZD. Yaşlanan dünya ve geriatri eǧitimi. Geriatri 2: 179-87, 1999.
16. Miller VT. Lacuner stroke: a reassesment. Arch Neurol 40: 129-34, 1983.
17. Keith RA. Status of measurement in stroke rehabilitation on outcomes. Stroke 21: 30-1, 1990.
18. Hesse, C, Bertelt et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 26: 976-81, 1995.