Modelling error and constitutive relations in simulation of flow and transport

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1211-1236

  Carey, Graham F ^a   Barth, William ^a   Woods, Juliette A ^a   Kirk, Benjamin S ^a   Anderson, Michael L ^a   Chow, Sum ^b   Bangerth, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive strategies; Constitutive equations; Finite elements; Modelling error

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POROUS MATERIALS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION;

CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS; CONSTITUTIVE LAWS; FLOW PROBLEMS; PARAMETER SENSITIVITY;

NEWTONIAN FLOW;

FLUID FLOW; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MODEL; TRANSPORT;

EID: 11244289248     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.797     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bangerth W, Rannacher R. Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations. Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, 2003.
2. Carey GF, Anderson ML, Carnes B, Kirk B. Some aspects of adaptive grid technology related to boundary and interior layers. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2004; 16:55-86.
3. Runnels SR, Carey GF. Finite element simulation of phase change using capacitance methods. Numerical Heat Transfer Part B 1991; 19 13-30.
4. Prandtl L. On fluid motions with very small friction. Verhdlg. 3. Intern. Math. Kongr., 1904, also NACA Technical Memorandum No. 452 1928.
5. Carey GF, Oden JT. Finite Elements: Computational Aspects. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
6. Carey GF, Richardson WB, Reed C, Mulvaney B. Circuit, Device and Process Simulation: Mathematical and Numerical Aspects. Wiley: New York, 1996.
7. Freitas CJ. Editorial policy statement on the control of numerical accuracy. Journal of Fluids Engineering (ASME) 1993; 115 2):339-340 (originally presented in [8] "... it will not accept for publication any paper reporting the numerical solution of a fluids engineering problem that fails to address the task of systematic truncation error testing and accuracy estimation.").
8. Roache PJ, Ghia K, White F. Editorial policy statement on the control of numerical accuracy. Journal of Fluids Engineering (ASME) 1986; 108(1):2
9. Verfürth R. A Review of A Posteriori Error Estimation and Adaptive Mesh Refinement Techniques. Wiley/Teubner: New York, Stuttgart, 1996.
10. Biswas D, Carey GF. Least-squares finite-element method to predict areal composition variations in large hydrocarbon reservoirs. SPE Journal 1998; 307-315.
11. Tarantola A. Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1987.
12. Babuška I, Jerina K, Li Y, Smith P. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of constitutive laws for plasticity with an emphasis on cyclic deformation. Technical Note BN-1146, University of Maryland, College Park, USA, 1993.
13. Anderson M, Bangerth W, Carey G. Analysis of parameter sensitivity and experimental design for a class of non-linear partial differential equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2004 (accepted).
14. Chow S, Carey GF, Anderson ML. Finite element approximations of a glaciology problem. M2AN Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 2004, in press.
15. Colinge J, Rappaz J. A strongly nonlinear problem arising in glaciology. M2AN Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 1999; 33 2):395-406.
16. Picasso M, Rappaz J, Reist A, Funk M, Blatter H. Numerical simulation of the motion of a two dimensional glacier.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 60:995-1009.
17. Voss CI, Souza WR. Variable density flow and solute transport simulation of regional aquifers containing a narrow freshwater-saltwater transition zone. Water Resources Research 1987; 23:1851-1866.
18. Elder J. Transient convection in a porous medium. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1967; 27:609-623.
19. Kolditz O, Ratke R, Diersch H-J, Zielke W. Coupled groundwater flow and transport: 1. Verification of variable density flow and transport models. Advances in Water Resources 1997; 21:27-46.
20. Holzbecher E. Modeling Density-driven Flow in Porous Media: Principles, Numerics, Software. Springer: Berlin, 1998.
21. Ségol G. Classic Groundwater Simulations-Proving and Improving Numerical Models. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
22. Cussler EL. Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984.
23. Intraval, Phase 1, case 13, Final Report. Technical Report, OECD 1991.
24. Stuyfzand PJ. An accurate relatively simple calculation of the saturation index of calcite for fresh to salt water. Journal of Hydrology 1989; 105:95-107.
25. Lever DA, Jackson CP. On the equations for the flow of concentrated salt solution through a porous medium. DOE/RW/85.100, Department of the Environment, U.K.
26. Woods JA, Barth W. Modelling brine density as a function of sodium chloride concentration. Unpublished CFDLab Presentation, University of Texas, 2003.
27. Woods JA, Carey GF. Upwelling and downwelling behaviour in the Elder-Voss-Souza benchmark. Advances in Water Resources 2004, in press.
28. Simmons CT, Narayan KA, Woods JA, Herczeg AL. Groundwater flow and solute transport at the Mourquong saline-water disposal basin, Murray Basin, southeastern Australia. Hydrogeology Journal 2002; 10 278-295.
29. Kirk BS, Peterson JW. libMesh. A C++ Finite Element Library. CFDLab, 2003. URL http://libmesh.sourceforge.net
30. Kelly DW, Gago JPdSR, Zienkiewicz OC, Babuška I. A posteriori error analysis and adaptive processes in the finite element method. I. Error analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1983; 19(11):1593-1619.
31. Cramer SD, Marchello JM. Numerical evaluation of models describing non-Newtonian behavior. AIChE Journal 1968; 14(6):980-983.
32. Eyring H. Viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion as examples of absolute reaction rates. Journal of Chemical Physics 1936; 4:283-287.
33. Baranger J, El Amri H. Estimateurs a posteriori d'erreurs pour le calcul adaptatif découlements quasi-Newtoniens. RAIRO Modé lisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique 1991; 25:31-48.
34. Ree FH, Ree T, Eyring H. Relaxation theory of transport problems in condensed systems. Industrial Engineering and Chemistry 1958; 50(7):1036-1040.
35. Oden JT, Vemaganti KS. Estimation of local modeling error and goal-oriented adaptive modeling of heterogeneous materials. I. Error estimates and adaptive algorithms. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 164(1):22-47.
36. Paterson WSB. The Physics of Glaciers (2nd edn). Pergamon: Oxford, 1981.
37. Seager MK, Carey GF. Adaptive domain extension and adaptive grids for unbounded spherical elliptic PDEs. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1990; 11(l):92-111.
38. Colinge J, Blatter H. Stress and velocity fields in glaciers: part I. Finite difference schemes for higher-order glacier models. Journal of Glaciology 1998; 44(148):448-456.
39. Bangerth W, Hartmann R, Kanschat G. deal. II. Technical Reference, Differential Equations Analysis Library, IWR, 2004. URL http://www.dealii.org