On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1)

Lingua

Volumn 115, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 939-957

  Cornips, Leonie ^a   Poletto, Cecilia ^b  

^a KNAW   (Netherlands)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dialectology; Non standard varieties; Standardisation; Syntactic elicitation; Syntactic variables

Indexed keywords

EID: 11244285191     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altenberg, E.P., Vago, R.M., 2002. The role of grammaticality judgments in investigating first language attrition: A cross-disciplinary perspective. In: Talk Presented at the International Conference on First Language Attrition: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Methodological Issues. Free University, Amsterdam, August 22-24, 2002. Ms Queens College and University of New York.
2. Auer, P. Europe's Sociolinguistic Unity, or: A Typology of European Dialect/standard Constellation. University of Freibourg.
3. Barbiers, S., Cornips, L., 2002. Introduction to syntactic microvariation. In: Barbiers, S., Cornips, L., van der Kleij, S. (Eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Electronic publication of the Meertens Instituut. http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/sand/synmic/
4. Bard E.G.Robertson D.Sorace A.Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability Language 72.1 1996 32-68
5. Bock J.K.Syntactic persistence in language production Cognitive Psychology 18 1986 335-387
6. Bucheli, C., Glaser, E., 2002. The Syntactic Atlas of Swiss German Dialects: Empirical and methodological problems. In: Barbiers, S., Cornips, L., van der Kleij S. (Eds.). Syntactic Microvariation. Electronic publication of the Meertens Instituut. http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/sand/synmic/
7. Carden G.Syntactic and semantic data: Replication results Language in Society 5 1976 99-104
8. Chomsky, N., 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger, New York.
9. Cornips, L., 1994. Syntactische variatie in het Algemeen Nederlands van Heerlen (Syntactic Variation in Heerlen Dutch). Unpublished Dissertation. University of Amsterdam/IFOTT 6.
10. Cornips, L., Jongenburger, W., 2001. Elicitation techniques in a Dutch syntactic dialect atlas project. In: Broekhuis H., van der Wouden T. (Eds.), Linguistics in The Netherlands 2001, vol. 18. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 57-69.
11. Cornips, L., Corrigan, K, to appear. Convergence and divergence in grammar. In: The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Contemporary Societies. In: Auer, P., Hinskens, F., Kerswill, P. (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Cowart, W., 1997. Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
13. Gervain, J., 2002. Linguistic Methodology and Microvariation in Language. Unpublished MA Thesis. University of Szeged.
14. Giles, H., Powesland, P.E., 1975. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. Academic press, New York.
15. Greenbaum S.Informant elicitation of data on syntactic variation Lingua 31 1973 201-212
16. Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
17. Labov W.When intuitions fail Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 32 1996 76-106
18. Milroy J.Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization Journal of Sociolinguistics 54 2001 530-555
19. Muysken, P., 2000. Bilingual Speech. A typology of Code-mixing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Oxford, R.L., 1982. Technical issues in designing and conducting research on language skill attrition. In: Lambert, R. Freed, B.F. (Eds.), The Loss of Language Skills. Rowley, Massachusetts, pp. 119-137.
21. Pellegrini G.Osservazioni di Sociolinguistica italiana Italia Dialettale 45 1982 1-36
22. Poletto, C., 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Rickford J.The haves and have nots: Sociolinguistic surveys and the assessment of speaker competence Language in Society 16-2 1987 149-177
24. Sanga G.I metodi della ricerca sul campo Rivista italiana di dialettologia 15 1991 165-183
25. Schütze, C.T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Vogelaer, G., De Annemie N., Guido, V.W., 2002. Complementizer Agreement in the Flemish Dialects. In: Barbiers, S., Cornips, L., van der Kleij S. (Eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Electronic Publication of the Meertens Instituut. http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/sand/synmic/
27. Weiß, H., 2002. Three types of negation: A case study in Bavarian. In: Barbiers, S., Cornips, L., van der Kleij S. (Eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Electronic Publication of the Meertens Instituut. http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/projecten/sand/synmic/