Trucking industry demand for urban shared use freight terminals

Transportation

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 23-36

  Regan, Amelia C ^a   Golob, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

City logistics; Shared use freight facilities; Trucking operations; Urban ports

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; SURVEYING; TRUCK TRANSPORTATION;

SHIPMENTS; TRAFFIC PERIODS; TRUCKING COMPANIES;

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; LOGISTICS; TRUCKING;

EID: 11244281039     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-004-2218-9     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J Aitchison S Silvey 1957 The generalization of probit analysis to the case of multiple responses Biometrika 44 131-140
2. JR Ashford 1959 An approach to the analysis of data for semi-quantal responses in biological response Biometrics 15 573-581
3. GM Clark WB Ashton 1977 The Location and Sizing of Urban Freight Terminals with Multiple Planning Periods: The Urban Terminal Investment Model (UTIM) Systems Research Group, Ohio State University Columbus Ohio. Report FR 3491-TR-4
4. Finnegan C, Finlay H & O'Mahoney M (2004) An initial assessment of the potential for urban distribution centers in Dublin. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
5. WF Friedman 1975 Physical distribution: The concept of shared services Harvard Business Review 53 2 24-36
6. TF Golob AC Regan 2003 Traffic congestion and trucking managers' use of automated routing and scheduling Transportation Research - Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 39 61-78
7. WH Greene 2000 Econometric Analysis 4th edition Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
8. RD McKelvey W Zavoina 1975 A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4 103-120
9. AG Morris AL Kornhauser 2000 Relationship of freight facilities in central business district office buildings to truck traffic Transportation Research Record 1707 56-63
10. SAIC (1994) HELP/Cresent Case Study . Report DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-94-11, Volpe National Transportation Systems center, US Department of Transportation, Cambridge, MA. http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/jpodocs/repts_te/ 9mv01!.pdf
11. SURFF (1998) Sustainable Urban and Regional Freight Flows: Project Results and Evaluation. TR 1053. EU/DG XIII Transport Telematics Applications Program. http://www.euroweb.net/surff/summary_report/report.htm.
12. E Taniguchi RECM van der Heijden 2000 An evaluation methodology for city logistics Transport Reviews 20 65-90
13. E Taniguchi M Noritake T Yamada T Izumitani 1999 Optimal size and location planning of public logistics terminals Transportation Research - Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 35 207-222
14. DA Tsamboulas I Dimitropoulos 1999 Appraisal of investments in European nodal centers for goods-freight villages: A comparative analysis Transportation 26 381-398
15. Weisbrod RE, Swiger E, Muller G, Rugg FM & Murphy MK (2002) Global freight villages: A solution to the urban freight dilemma. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
16. W Young SG Ritchie KW Ogden 1980 Factors that influence freight facility location preference Transportation Research Record 747 71-77