Endopyelotomy in childhood: Our experience with 37 patients

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 952-958

  Tállai, Béla ^a,b   Salah, Morshed Ali ^a   Flaskó, Tibor ^a   Tóth, Csaba ^a   Varga, Attila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENDOPYELOTOMY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; GUIDE WIRE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; PYELOTOMY; URETER CATHETER; URETER STRICTURE; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 11244268708     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.952     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Badlani G, Esghi M, Smith AD. Percutaneous surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (endopyelotomy): Technique and early results. J Urol 1986;135:26-28.
2. Karlin G, Badlani G, Smith AD. Percutaneous pyeloplasty (endopyelotomy) for congenital ureteroplevic junction obstruction. Urology 1992;39:533-537.
3. Gerber GS, Lyon ES. Endopyelotomy: Patient selection, results, and complications. Urology 1994;43:2-10.
4. Segura JW. Antegrade endopyelotomy. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:311-316.
5. Bernardo N, Smith AD. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol 1999;52:541-548.
6. Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, et al. Adult endopyelotomy: Impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome. J Urol 1998;160:685-689.
7. Wickham JEA, Kellet MJ. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur Urol 1983;9:122-124.
8. Whitfield HN, Mills V. Percutaneous pyelolysis: An alternative to pyeloplasty. Br J Urol 1983;66:93-96.
9. Tóth CS, Pásztor I, Holman E, et al. Endopyelotomia. LAM 1993;3:46-49.
10. Kahn AM, Holman E, Pasztor I, et al. Endopyelotomy: Experience with 320 cases. J Endourol 1997;11:243-246.
11. Francisco JB, Sampaio MD. The dilemma of the crossing vessel at the ureteropelvic junction: Precise anatomy study. J Endourol 1996;10:411-413.
12. Bernardo NO, Smith AD. Percutaneous endopyelotomy. Urology 2000;56:322-327.
13. Oshinsky GS, Jarrett TW, Smith AD. New technique in managing ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Percutaneous endoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 1996;10:147-151.
14. Gallucci M, Alpi G. Antegrade transpelvic endopyelotomy in primary obstruction of the ureteroplevic junction. J Endourol 1996;10:127-132.
15. Monga M. Mini-percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy. Techn Urol 1999;5:223-225.
16. Mandhani A. Endopyelotomy sheath: A new device to facilitate antegrade endopyelotomy. J Urol 2003;169:1782-1784.
17. Tawfiek ER, Liu JB, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteroplevic junction obstruction. J Urol 1998;160:1643-1646.
18. Chandhoke PS, Clayman RV, Stone AM, et al. Endopyelotomy and endoureterotomy with the Acucise ureteral cutting balloon device: Preliminary experience. J Endourol 1993;7:45-51.
19. Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Clayman RV. Acucise endopyelotomy: Evolution of a less-invasive technology. J Endourol 1996;10:133-139.
20. Bolton DM, Bogaert GA, Mevorach RA, et al. Pediatric ureteropelvic junction treated with retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 1994;44:609-613.
21. Bogaert GA, Kogan BA, Mevorach RA, et al. Efficacy of retrograde endopyelotomy in children. J Urol 1996;156:734-737.
22. Gerber GS, Kim J, Nold S, et al. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy for the treatment of primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Tech Urol 2000;6:46-49.
23. Biyani CS, Cornford PA, Powell CS. Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy with the holmium: YAG laser: Mid-term results. Eur Urol 2000;38:139-143.
24. Giddens JL, Grasso M. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using the holmium:YAG laser. J Urol 2000;164:1509-1512.
25. Kavoussi LR, Meretyk S, Dierks SM, et al. Endopyelotomy for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Urol 1991;145:345-349.
26. Jabbour ME, Goldfischer ER, Klima WJ, et al. Endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty: The long-term results. J Urol 1998;160:690-692.
27. Danuser H, Ackermann DK, Bohlen D, et al. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol 1998;159:66.
28. Tan HL, Najmaldin A, Webb DR. Endopyelotomy for pelviureteric junction obstruction in children. Eur Urol 1993;24:84-88.
29. Figenshau RS, Clayman RV, Colberg JW, et al. Pediatric endopyelotomy: The Washington University experience. J Urol 1996;156:2025-2030.
30. Figenshau RS, Clayman RV. Endourologic options for management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the pediatric patienrt. Urol Clin North Am 1998;25:199-209.
31. Schenkman EM, Tarry WF. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1998;159:1013-1015.
32. Nicholls G, Hrouda D, Kellett MJ, et al. Endopyelotomy in the symptomatic older child. BJU Int 2001;87:525-527.
33. Sutherland RW, Chung SK, Roth DR, et al. Pediatric pyeloplasty: Outcome analysis based on patient age and surgical technique. Urology 1997;50:963-966.
34. Wolpert JJ, Woodard JR, Parrott TS. Pyeloplasty in the young infant. J Urol 1989;142:573-575.
35. Shaul DB, Cunningham JA, Lowe P, et al. Infant pyeloplasty is a low-risk procedure. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:343-347.
36. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001;87:287-289.
37. Arun N, Kekre NS, Nath V, et al. Is open pyeloplasty still justifield? Br J Urol 1997;80:379-381.
38. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-1256.
39. Pardalidis NP, Papatsoris AG, Kosmaoglou EV. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2002;168:1937-1940.
40. Siqueira TM Jr, Nadu A, Kuo RL, et al. Laparoscopic treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2002;60:973-978.
41. Deger S, Roigas J, Wille A, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with Anderson-Hynes technique. Urologe A 2003;42:347-353.
42. Baldwinn DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, et al. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2003;17:155-160.
43. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: The method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268-275.
44. Tan HL, Roberts JP. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children: Preliminary results. Br J Urol 1996;77:909-913.
45. El-Ghoneimi A, Farhat W, Bolduc S, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children. BJU Int 2003;92:104-108.
46. Tan HL. Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 1999;162:1045-1047.