A comparison of cyanoacrylate fuming in a vacuum cabinet to a humidity fuming chamber

Journal of Forensic Identification

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 10-27

  Bessman, Carl W ^a   Nelson, Elizabeth ^a   Lipert, Robert J ^b   Coldiron, Shelley ^b   Herrman, Terrance R ^c  

^a Criminalistics Laboratory   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Combisep Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYANOACRYLATE;

ARTICLE; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; FINGER DERMATOGLYPHICS; FUME; HEATING; HUMIDITY; PRESSURE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; TEMPERATURE; VACUUM; VAPORIZATION;

EID: 11244267458     PISSN: 0895173X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Lee, H. C.; Harris, H. A. Physical Evidence in Forensic Science. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co. Inc.: Tucson, AZ, 2000; pp 142-143.
2. Mock, J. P. Cyanoacrylates and Heat-A Word of Caution. Ident. News, September 1985, p 7.
3. Watkin, J. E.; Wilkinson, D. A.; Misner, A. H.; Yamashita, A. B. Cyanoacrylate Fuming of Latent Prints: Vacuum Versus Heat/Humidity. J. For. Ident. 1994, 44 (5), 545-57.
4. Chemical Formulas and Processing Guide for Developing Latent Prints; US Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Laboratory Division, Latent Fingerprint Section: Washington, DC, 1994.