Using components to increase maintainability in a large telecommunication system

Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 65-73

  Algestam, H ^a   Offesson, M ^a   Lundberg, L ^b  

^a ERICSSON RESEARCH   (Sweden)

^b BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bit error rate; Encoding; Filters; Graphical user interfaces; Mediation; Protocols; Software engineering; Switches; Telecommunication switching; Telephony

Indexed keywords

BIT ERROR RATE; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); FILTERS (FOR FLUIDS); GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; MAINTAINABILITY; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SWITCHES; USER INTERFACES;

COMPONENT BASED; COMPONENT-BASED ARCHITECTURE; EXISTING SYSTEMS; MEDIATION; PERFORMANCE DEGRADATION; PERFORMANCE LEVEL; REAL TIME; TELEPHONY;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 11244263590     PISSN: 15301362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2002.1182976     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bengtsson P., Architecture-Level Modifiability Analysis, Doctoral Thesis, Department of Software Engineering and Computer Science, Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2002
2. Bosch, J., Design & Use of Software Architectures, Addison-Wesley, 2000
3. Hermansson H., Johansson M. and Lundberg L., A Distributed Component Architecture for a Large Telecommunication Application, in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Asian-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2000), Singapore, Dec. 2000, pp. 188-195.
4. Hopkins J., Component Primer, Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 10, October 2000
5. Häggander D., Bengtsson P., Bosch J. and Lundberg L., Maintainability Myth Causes Performance Problems in Parallel Applications, in Proceedings of the 3rd International IAS TED Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, 1999.
6. Häggander D. and Lundberg L., Optimizing Dynamic Memory Management in a Multithreaded Application Executing on a Multiprocessor, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Parallel Processing, Minneapolis, USA 1998, pp. 262-269.
7. ITU-T X.209, Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Syntax Notation One, International Telecommunication Union, 1993
8. Larman C., Applying UML and Patterns 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, 2001
9. Lakos J., Large-Scale C++ Software Design, Addison-Wesley, 1996
10. McCall J.A., Quality Factors, Software Engineering Encyclopedia, Vol 2, 1994
11. Mejstad V., Tångby K-J. and Lundberg L., Improving Multiprocessor Performance of a Large Telecommunication System by Replacing Interpretation with Compilation, in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, April 2002, Lund, Sweden, pp. 77-85.
12. Miller P., Recursive Make Considered Harmful, AUUGN Journal of Australian UNIX and Open Systems User Group Inc., vol. 19, no. 1, 1998
13. mozilla.org, http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xpcom/, visited 11/06/2002.
14. Myrén H., Piculell J. and Lundberg L., Run-Time Upgradable Software, in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Real-Time Technology and Applications Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan May 2001, pp. 226-235.
15. Nierstrasz O. and Meijler T. D., Research Directions in Software Composition, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 27, no. 2, June 1995
16. Object Management Group, The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, Revision 2.5, September 2001
17. Pfleger S. L., Software Engineering, Theory and Practice, Prentice Hall, 1998
18. Seeley D., Shared Libraries as Objects, in Proceedings of the USENIX Summer Conference, 1990
19. Szyperski C., Component Software, Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, Addison-Wesley, 1998
20. Williams S. and Kindel C., The Component Object Model: A Technical Overview, White paper, Microsoft Corporation, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/techart/msdn-comppr.htm, 1994, visited 11/06/2002