A four-component efficiency index for assessing land development using remote sensing and GIS

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 47-57

  Li, Xia ^a,b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGZHOU INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LAND USE; MORPHOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING;

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS; LAND DEVELOPMENT; LAND USE PROBLEMS;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

GIS; INDEX METHOD; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 11244255250     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.71.1.47     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Banister, D., S. Watson, and C. Wood, 1997. Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form, Environment and Planning B, 24:125-143.
2. Batty, M., Y.C. Xie, and Z.L. Sun, 1999. Modelling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata, Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 23:205-233.
3. Burchell, R.W., N.A. Shad, D. Listokin, H. Phillips, A. Downs, S. Seskin, J. S. Davis, T. Moore, D. Helton, and M. Gall, 1998. The costs of sprawl - revisited, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 268 p.
4. Carlson, T.N., and G.A. Sanchez-Azofeifa, 1999. Satellite remote sensing of land use changes in and around San Jose, Costa Rica, Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(3):247-256.
5. Eastman, J.R., and M. Fulk, 1993. Long sequence time series evaluation using standardized principle components, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 59(6):991-996.
6. Eastman, J.R., 1999. Multi-criteria evaluation and GIS, Geographical Information Systems (P.A. Longley, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire, and D.W. Rhind, editors), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 493-502.
7. Ewing, R., 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1):107-126.
8. Fung, T., and E. LeDrew, 1987. Application of principal components analysis change detection, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 53(12):1649-1658.
9. Howarth, P.J., 1986. Landsat digital enhancements for change detection in urban environment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 13:149-160.
10. Jenks, M., E. Burton, and K. Williams, 1996. Compact cities and sustainability: an introduction, The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? (M. Jenks, E. Burton, and K. Williams, editors), E&FN SPON, London, pp. 11-12.
11. Jensen, J.R., K. Rutchey, M.S. Koch, and S. Narumalani, 1995. Inland wetland change detection in the Everglades Water Conservation Area 2A using a time series of normalized remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61(2):199-209.
12. Johnson, M., 2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda, Environment and Planning A, 33:717-735.
13. Jusoff, K., and S. Senthavy, 2003. Land use change detection using remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) in Gua Musang district, Kelantan, Malaysia, Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 15 (2):303-312.
14. Li, X., 1993. A united model for quantitative remote sensing of suspended sediment concentration, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(14):2665-2676.
15. Li, X., and A.G.O. Yeh, 1998. Principal component analysis of stacked multi-temporal images for monitoring of rapid urban expansion in the Pearl River Delta, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(8):1501-1518.
16. Mcrae, S.G., and C.P. Burnham, 1981. Land Evaluation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 239 p.
17. Martin, L.R.G., 1989. An evaluation of Landsat-based change detection methods applied to the rural-urban fringe, Remote Sensing and Methodologies of Land Use Change Analysis (C. R. Bryant, E. F. LeDrew, C. Marois, and F. Cavayas, editors), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, pp. 101-116.
18. Saaty, T.L., 1990. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 287 p.
19. State Council, 1994. Ordinance for the protection of primary agricultural land, State Council, Beijing, China, 12 p. (in Chinese).
20. Su, Z., 2000. Remote sensing of land use and vegetation for mesoscale hydrological studies, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (2):213-233.
21. Thomas, R.W., 1981. Information Statistics in Geography, Geo Abstracts, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, 42 p.
22. Tietenberg, T., 2003. Environmental and natural resource economics, Addison Wesley, Boston, 646 p.
23. Tucker, C.J., 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combination for monitoring vegetation, Remote Sensing of Environment, 8:127-150.
24. Wong, R.K, T. Fung, K.S. Leung, and Y. Leung, 1997. The compression of a sequence of satellite images based on change detection, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(11):2427-2436.
25. Wu, F., and C.J. Webster, 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation, Environment and Planning B, 25:103-126.
26. Xie, Y., 1996. A generalized model for cellular urban dynamics, Geographical Analysis, 28:350-373.
27. Yeh, A.G.O., and X. Li, 1998. Sustainable land development model for rapid growth areas using GIS, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(2):169-189.
28. _, 2001. The measurement and monitoring of urban sprawl in a rapid growing region using the entropy method, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67(1):83-90.
29. Zhou, J.M., 2001. Sustainable development in Asia, America and Europe with global applications: a new approach to land ownership, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK, 518 p.