The influence of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on implantable cardiac medical devices;Influence des champs électromagnétiques non ionisants sur les dispositifs cardiaques médicaux implantables

Presse Medicale

Volumn 33, Issue 22, 2004, Pages 1611-1615

  Souques, Martine ^a  

^a GAZ DE FRANCE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; DEFIBRILLATION; DEFIBRILLATOR; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EQUIPMENT; IMPLANT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIOFREQUENCY; REVIEW; SAFETY; SHOCK; SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 11244249523     PISSN: 07554982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0755-4982(04)99003-3     Document Type: Short Survey

References (31)

1. American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). EMF. In : Threshold Limit Values for chemical substances and physical agents. Biological exposure indices. 2nd ed. Cincinati : ACGIH; 1996. p. 118-19.
2. Andrivet P. Dispositifs médicaux implantables et compatibilité électromagnétique. Arch Mal Cœur Vaisseaux 2003; 96 (Spécial III) : 57-64.
3. Conseil des Communautés européennes. Recommandation du Conseil du 12 juillet 1999 relative à la limitation du public aux champs électromagnétiques (de 0 Hz à 300 GHz). Journal officiel des Communaute's européennes 1999; L199 (30 juillet 1999) : 59-70.
4. Butrous GS, Male JC, Webber RS et al. The effect of power frequency high intensity electric fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1983; 6: 1282-92.
5. Kaye GC, Butrous GS, Allen A et al. The effect of 50 Hz external electrical interference on implanted cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 999-1008.
6. Astridge PS, Kaye GC, Whitworth S et al. The response of implanted dual chamber pacemakers to 50 Hz extraneous electrical interference. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993; 16: 1966-74.
7. Toivoinen L, Valjus J, Hongisto M et al. The influence of elevated 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields on implanted cardiac pacemakers : the role of the lead configuration and programming of the sensitivity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991; 14: 2114-22.
8. Salmi J, Eskola HJ, Pitkänen MA et al. The influence of electromagnetic interference and ionizing radiation on cardiac pacemakers. Strahlenther Onkol 1990; 166: 153-6.
9. Silny J. The interference of electronic implants in low frequency electromagnetic fields. Arch Mal Cœur Vaisseaux 2003; 96 (Spécial III) : 30-4.
10. Souques M, Frank R, Himbert C et al. Effets des champs magnétiques de 50, 60 Hz et de 20 à 50 kHz sur le fonctionnement des cardiostimulateurs implantés. Environnement, Risques & Santé 2002; 1: 87-96.
11. Copperman Y, Zarfati D, Laniado S. The effect of metal detector gates on implanted permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988; 11: 1386-7.
12. Kolb C, Schmieder S, Lehmann G et al. Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators ? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 2054-9.
13. Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A et al. Do European GSM mobile phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients ? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995; 18: 1218-24.
14. Hayes DL, Von Fekt LK, Neubauer SA et al. Effect of digital phones on permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995; 18: 863.
15. Nuegell B, Osswald S, Deola M et al. Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1471-7.
16. Hayes DL, Wang PJ, Reynolds DW et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by cellular telephones. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1473-9.
17. Trigano AJ, Azoulay A. Étude des risques de perturbations induites par la téléphonie mobile sur la stimulation cardiaque. Stimucoeur 1998; 26: 82-6.
18. Trigano AJ, Azoulay A, Rochdi M et al. Electromagnetic interference of external pacemakers by walkie-talkies and digital cellular phones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 588-93.
19. Jacquemart JF, Razzani M. Stimulateurs cardiaques et interférences radiofréquences. Stimucoeur 1998; 26: 53-4.
20. Irnich W, Batz L, Muller R et al. Electromagnetic interference of pacemakers by mobile telephones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 1431-46.
21. Occhetta E, Plebani L, Bortnik M et al. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cellular telephones: is there any interference? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999; 22: 983-9.
22. Beaugeard D, Kacet S, Bricout M et al. Interférences entre les stimulateurs cardiaques et les détecteurs de vol dans les magasins. Arch Mal Coeur Vais 1992; 85: 1457-61.
23. Dodinot B, Godenir J, Costa AB et al. The effects of electronic article surveillance, a possible danger for pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993; 16: 46-53.
24. Lucas EH, Johnson CM, Mc Elroy P. The effects of electronic article surveillance systems on cardiac pacemakers: an in vitro study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994; 17: 2021-6.
25. Fetter JG, Benditt DG, Stanton MS. Electromagnetic interference from welding and motors on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators as tested in the electrically hostile work site. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 423-7.
26. McIvor ME, Sridhar S. Interactions between cardiac pacemakers and antishoplifting security systems. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1394-5.
27. Wilke A, Kruse T, Hesse H et al. Interactions between pacemakers and security systems. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 1784-8.
28. Trigano AJ. Interférences et stimulateurs - dé fribrillateurs cardiaques. Résultats des études expérimentales in vivo en radiofréquences. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2003; 96 (Spécial III) : 42-5.
29. McIvor ME. Environmental electromagnetic interference from electronic article surveillance devices: interactions with an ICD. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995; 18: 2229-30.
30. Mathew P, Lewis C, Neglia J et al. Interaction between electronic article surveillance systems and implantable defibrillators: insights from a fourth generation ICD. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997; 20: 2857-9.
31. De Sèze R. Compatibilité des implants actifs en milieu professionnel. Arch Mal Cœur Vaiss 2003; 96 (Spécial III) : 65-70.