Costly capital reallocation and energy use

Review of Economic Dynamics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 494-518

  Díaz, Antonia ^a   Puch, Luis A ^b   Guilló, María D ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Capital reallocation; Energy price; Energy use; Number of plants

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144354880     PISSN: 10942025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Atkeson, A., Kehoe, P.J., 1999. Models of energy use: putty-putty versus putty-clay. American Economic Review 89 (4), 1028-1043.
2. Berndt, E.R., Wood, D.O., 1975. Technology, prices and the derived demand for energy. Review of Economics and Statistics 57 (3), 259-268.
3. Bresnahan, T.F., Ramey, V.A., 1993. Segments shifts and capacity utilization in the US automobile industry. American Economic Review 83 (2), 213-218.
4. Cooley, T.F., Hansen, G.H., Prescott, E.C., 1995. Equilibrium business cycles with idle resources and variable capacity utilization. Economic Theory 6, 39-45.
5. Cooley, T.F., Prescott, E.C., 1995. Economic growth and business cycles. Chapter 1 in: Cooley, T.F. (Ed.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
6. Davis, S.J., Haltiwanger, J., 1999. Sectoral job creation and destruction responses to oil price changes. NBER working paper 7095.
7. Doms, M.E., Dunne, T., 1993. Energy intensity, electricity consumption, and advanced manufacturing technology usage. Center for Economic Studies working paper 93-9. UU Bureau of the Census.
8. Finn, M.G., 1996. Variance properties of Solow's productivity residual and their cyclical implications. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19 (57), 1249-1281.
9. Goulder, L.H., 1992. Carbon tax design and US industry performance. Chapter 6 in: Poterba, J.M. (Ed.), Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 6. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Goulder, L.H., 1993. Energy taxes: Traditional efficiency effects and environmental implications. NBER working paper 4582.
11. Goulder, L.H., 1995. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: An intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (3), 271-297.
12. Griffin, J.M., Gregory, P.R., 1976. An intercountry translog model of energy substitution responses. American Economic Review 66 (5), 845-857.
13. Hamilton, J.D., 1988. A neoclassical model of unemployment and the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy 96 (3), 593-617.
14. Hansen, G.D., 1985. Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 16, 309-318.
15. Jorgenson, D.W., Wilcoxen, P.J., 1993. Reducing US carbon emissions: An econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics 15 (1), 7-25.
16. Juillard, M., 1997. Dynare: A program for the resolution and simulation of dynamic models with forward variables through the use of a relaxation algorithm. CEPREMAP working paper 9602.
17. Kim, I.M., Loungani, P., 1992. The role of energy in real business cycle models. Journal of Monetary Economics 29 (2), 173-189.
18. Newell, R.G., Jaffe, A.B., Stavins, R.N., 1999. The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), 941-975.
19. Pindyck, R.S., 1991. Interfuel substitution and the industrial demand for energy: An international comparison. Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (2), 173-189.
20. Pindyck, R.S., Rotemberg, J.J., 1983. Dynamic factor demands and the effects of energy price shocks. American Economic Review 73 (5), 1066-1079.
21. Rogerson, R., 1988. Indivisible labour lotteries and equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics 21, 3-16.
22. Rotemberg, J.J., Woodford, M., 1996. Imperfect competition and the effects of energy price increases on economic activity. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (4), 549-577.
23. Sakellaris, P., 1997. Irreversible capital and the stock market response to shocks in profitability. International Economic Review 58 (2), 351-379.