National differences in publishing papers on adverse drug reactions

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 108-111

  Ferner, R E ^a   Aronson, J K ^b  

^a CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b RADCLIFFE INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adverse drug reactions; Epidemiology; International comparisons; Pharmacoeconomics; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; GEOGRAPHY; PHARMACOECONOMICS; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CULTURE; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PUBLISHING; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 11144342775     PISSN: 03065251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02267.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Pezzullo JC. Exact Binomial and Poisson Confidence Intervals. http://members.aol.com/johnp71/confint.html, accessed 23 December 2003.
2. Central Intelligence Agency. The World Factbook. http:// www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/, accessed 15th May 2004.
3. Olsson S, Sjostrom H. Data on numbers of adverse drug reaction reports submitted to the World Health Organization Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centre in Uppsala by country for each year 1988-2001 (Personal communication).
4. Population of world. http://www.populationworld.com/, accessed 23 December 2003.
5. Penn RG, Griffin JP. Adverse reactions to nitrofurantoin in the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Holland. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 284: 1440-2.