Intrauterine insemination versus Fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal subfertility: A systematic review based on a Cochrane review

Human Reproduction

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2721-2729

  Cantineau, A E P ^a   Heineman, M J ^b   Al Inany, H ^c   Cohlen, B J ^a  

^a ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Obstetrics/Gynaecology ^*  (Egypt)

Author keywords

Fallopian tube sperm perfusion; Intrauterine insemination; Non tubal subfertility; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CLOMIFENE CITRATE; FOLLITROPIN; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

BALLOON CATHETER; BIRTH RATE; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FALLOPIAN TUBE SPERM PERFUSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENSTRUATION DISORDER; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREGNANCY RATE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUBFERTILITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FALLOPIA;

EID: 11144330158     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh523     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Allahbadia GN, Desai SK, Kania PM, PaiDhungat PB and Nariani CM (1998) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination: a prospective study at a University Teaching Hospital. Fertil Steril 70,S438.
2. Arroyo Vieyra O, Ortiz Elias F, Venegas Flores R, Montaya L, Verez Ruiz J, Colin y Nunes JS and Gutierrez Najar A (1995) Comparación de dos técnicas de inseminació nartificial (Perfusion tubarica de esperma e inseminacion intrauterina) [Sperm tubal perfusion and intrauterine insemination]. Ginecol Obstet Mexico 63,514-517.
3. Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ and Farquhar C (2004) Semen preparationtechniques for intrauterine insemination (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3.
4. Bukman A and Heineman MJ (2001) Ovarian reserve testing and the use of prognostic models in patients with subfertility. Hum Reprod Update 7, 581-590.
5. Carrell DT, Kuneck PH, Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP and Campbell BF (1998) A randomized, prospective analysis of five sperm preparation techniques before intrauterine insemination of husband sperm. Fertil Steril 69,122-126.
6. Ciftci C, Sonmez C, Abban G, Unal S, Yilmaz A and Uner M (1998) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FTSP) does not seem to yield better pregnancy rates on standard intrauterine insemination. A prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 70,S425.
7. Cohlen BJ, te Velde ER, van Kooij RJ, Looman CW and Habbema JD (1998) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treating male subfertility: a controlled study. Hum Reprod 13, 1553-1558.
8. Crosignani PG and Rubin B (1996) Prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and management of infertility. Hum Reprod 11,1775-1807.
9. Desai SK, Nariani CM, Allahbadia GN, Singhal A-B, Kania PM, Karanjgaokar VK, PaiDhungat PB and Gudi AA (1998) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination: a preliminary report form a University teaching hospital. Middle East Fertil Soc J 3,267-271.
10. Dodson WC and Haney AF (1991) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 55,457.
11. Elhelw B, Matar H and Soliman EM (2000) A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and two methods of fallopian tube sperm perfusion. Middle East Fertil Soc J 5,83-84.
12. El Sadek MM, Amer MK and Abdel-Malak G (1998) Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion. Hum Reprod 13,3053-3056.
13. Fanchin R, Oliveness F, Righini C, Hazout A, Schwab B and Frydman R (1995) A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high a standard intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 64,505-510.
14. Fanchin R, Olivennes F, Righini C and Frydman R (1996) The efficacy of tubal sperm perfusion? Fertil Steril 66,169-170.
15. Fanchin R, Olivennes F, Righini C and Frydman R (1997) Letters to the editor; reply to the reply on IUI. Fertil Steril 67,1178-1179.
16. Filer RB, Rafferty JH and Fitzgerald KE (1996) Classical intrauterine insemination vs fallopian tube sperm perfusion: fecundity rates in an unselected infertility population. Fertil Steril 66,S84.
17. Goverde AJ, McDonnell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF and Schoemaker J (2000) Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility; a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 355(9197),13-18.
18. Gregoriou O, Pyrrgiotis E, Konidaris S, Papadias C and Zourlas PA (1995) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility. Gynaecol Obstet Invest 39,226-228.
19. Hughes EG (1997) The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 12,1865-1872.
20. Kahn JA, Von During V, Sunde A and Molne K (1992a) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion used in a donor insemination programme. Hum Reprod 7, 806-812.
21. Kahn JA, Von During V, Sunde A, Sordal T and Molne K (1992b) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: first clinical experience. Hum Reprod 7,19-24.
22. Kahn JA, Sunde A, Koskemies A, Von During V, Sordal T, Christensen F and Molne K (1993a) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 8,890-894.
23. Kahn JA, Sunde A, Von During V, Sordal T and Molne K (1993b) Treatment of unexplained infertility. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand 72,193-199.
24. Kamel MA and Ahmed A (1999) Comparative study between intrauterine insemination and fallopian tube sperm perfusion in the treatment of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 14(Abstract Book),308-309.
25. Karande VC, Rao R, Pratt DE, Balin M, Levrant S, Morris R, Dudkeiwicz A and Gleicher N (1995) A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and fallopian tube sperm perfusion for the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 64,638-640.
26. Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Bearman JE, Albotiano S, Sonin Y, Weiss N and Potashnik G (1999) Does transcervical intra-fallopian insemination improve pregnancy rate in cases of oligoteratoasthenozoospermia? A prospective randomized study. Andrologia 31,173-177.
27. Li TC (1993) A simple non-invasive method of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion. Hum Reprod 8,1848-1850.
28. Maheshwari A, Jain K and Agarwal N (1999) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) using a Foley's balloon system versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65,313-315.
29. Mamas L (1996) Higher pregnancy rates with a simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion, using the cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod 11,2618-2622.
30. Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tuomivaara L, Juntunen K, Tomas C and Martikainen H (1997) Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intra-uterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 67,939-942.
31. Papier S, Feder M, Fiszbajn G, Borghi M, Nodar F, Acosta AA and Chillik CF (1997) Intrauterine insemination (M) versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FTSP): a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril (Abstracts of the meeting of American Society for Reproductive Medicine),S209-S210.
32. Papier S, Grabia A, Geder M, Lami A, Elberger L and Borghi M (1998) Intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FTSP): a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 70 (Suppl 1),S140.
33. Prietl GP, Van der Ven HH, Haidl G, Kohler M and Krebs D (1999) Prospective randomized trial of utero-tubal insemination versus conventional intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 14,53-54.
34. Ricci G, Nucera G, Pozzobon C, Boscolo R, Giolo E and Guaschino S (2001) A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 7, 1242-1248.
35. Ripps BA, Minhas BS, Carson SA and Buster JE (1994) Intrauterine insemination in fertile women delivers larger number of sperm to the peritoneal fluid than intracervical insemination. Fertil Steril 61,398-400.
36. Soliman EM, Salit ME, Ebrashy AN, Sheiba MA and Attia AM (1999) A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and two methods of fallopian tube sperm perfusion. Middle East Fertil Soc J 4,162-168.
37. Strandell A, Bergh C, Soderlund B, Lundin K and Nilsson L (2003) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion; the impact of sperm count on morphology on pregnancy rates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82,1023-1029.
38. Trout SW (1999) Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of the literature. Fertil Steril 71,881-885.
39. Van Voorhis BJ and Syrop CH (2000) Cost-effective treatment of couple with infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43,958-973.
40. World Health Organization (1992) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.