Parametric imaging in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI - Phantom and in vivo studies

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

Volumn 26 II, Issue , 2004, Pages 1104-1107

  Ruminski, J ^a   Bobek Billewicz, B ^b  

^a GDANSK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK   (Poland)

Author keywords

DSC MRI; Parametric imaging; Phantom studies

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; ESTIMATION; FAST FOURIER TRANSFORMS; FUNCTIONS; MEDICAL IMAGING;

DSC MRI; PARAMETRIC IMAGING; PHANTOM STUDIES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 11144324296     PISSN: 05891019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. F. Calamante, D.G. Gadian, A. Connelly, Quantification of Perfusion Using Bolus Tracking Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke. Assumptions, Limitations, and Potential Implications for Clinical Use, Stroke.;33:1146-1151, 2002.
2. J. Wang, D. C. Alsop, L. Li, J. Listerud, J. B. Gonzalez-At, M. D. Schnall, J. A. Detre, Comparison of Quantitative Perfusion Imaging Using Arterial Spin Labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 48:242-254, 2002.
3. W. Cai, D. D. Feng, R. Fulton, Content based retrieval of dynamic PET functional images, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 4 (2)152-158, 2000.
4. J. Rumiński, M. Kaczmarek, A. Nowakowski, Medical Active Thermography - A New Image Reconstruction Method, Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS2124, Springer, 274-181, 2001.
5. Østergaard L, Weisskoff R M, Chester D A, Gyldensted C and Rosen B R High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages: L Mathematical approach and statistical analysis, II. Experimental comparison and preliminary results Magn. Reson. Med. 36 715-36, 1996.
6. Zierler KL. Theoretical Basis of Indicator-Dilution Methods for Measuring Flow and Volume. Circ.Res. 10:393-407, 1962.
7. Calamante F, Thomas D L, Pell G S, Wiersma J and Turner R Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 19 701-35, 1999.
8. T. Van Osch, Evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics by quantitative perfusion MRI, PhD thesis, Image Science Institute, Utrecht, 2002.
9. A.G. Sorensen, P. Reimer, Cerebral MR Perfusion Imaging, Principles and Current Applications, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 2000.
10. Calamante F, Gadian D G and Connelly A 2000 Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition Magn. Reson. Med. 44 466-73
11. Quarks, C.C., Pathak, A.P., Ward, B.D., Rebro, K.J., Schmainda, K.M. Reliability of Measuring Tumor Perfusion using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI: The Influence of Vascular Structure and Imaging Technique. 10th Scientific Meeting & Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honululu, Hawaii, USA, May 18-24, 2002.
12. E.D. Morris, T.A. Tasciyan, J.W. VanMeter, J.M. Maisong, T.A. Zeffiro, Automated determination of the arterial input function for MR perfusion analysis. Available: www.indyrad.iupui.edu/public/emorris/Sensor/poster.pdf
13. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn. Reson. Med. 34:555-66, 1995.
14. C.Z. Simonsen, L. Ostergaard, D.F. Smith, P. Vastergaard-Pulsen, C. Gyldensted, Comparision of gradient- and spin-echo imaging: CBF, CBV and MTT measurements by bolus tracking, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 12:411-46, 2000.
15. Schreiber WG, Gückel F, Srritzke P, Schmiedek P, Schwarte A, Brix G, Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve capacity: estimation by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 18:1143-1156, 1998.
16. Vonken EP, Beekman FJ, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn.Reson.Med. 41:343-50, 1999.
17. I.K. Andersen, A. Szymkowiak, C.E. Rasmussen, L.G. Hanson, J.R. Marstrand, H.B.W. Larsson, L.K. Hansen1 Perfusion Quantification Using Gaussian Process Deconvolution, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 48:351-361, 2002.
18. L H Cheong, T S Koh, Z Hou, An automatic approach for estimating bolus arrival time in dynamic contrast MRI using piecewise continuous regression models Phys. Med. Biol. 48:N83-N88, 2003.
19. Østergaard L, Smith DF, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Hansen SB, Gee A, Gjedde A, Gyldensted C. Absolute Cerebral Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measured by MRI Bolus Tracking: Comparison with PET Values. J.Cereb.BloodFlow Metab. 18:425-32, 1998.