On the association between a random parameter and an observable

Test

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 85-111

  Van Der Linde, Angelika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Expected information; Expected utility; Hypothesis testing; Model choice; Model complexity; Odds ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144318013     PISSN: 11330686     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02603002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BERNARDO, J. M. (1979). Expected information as expected utility. Annals of Statistics, 7:686-690.
2. BERNARDO, J. M. (1999). Nested hypothesis testing. The Bayesian reference criterion. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, eds., Bayesian Statistics, vol. 6, pp. 101-130. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. BERNARDO, J. M. and BERMÚDEZ, J. D. (1985). The choice of variables in probabilistic classification. In J. B. et al., ed., Bayesian Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 67-81. North Holland, Amsterdam.
4. BERNARDO, J. M. and SMITH, A. F. M. (1994). Bayesian Theory. Wiley, New York.
5. BURNHAM, K. and ANDERSON, D. R. (1998). Model Selection and Inference. Springer, New York.
6. DEGROOT, M. H. (1962). Uncertainty, information and sequential experiments. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33:404-419.
7. EFRON, B. (1986). How biased is the apparent error rate of a prediction rule? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81:461-470.
8. GUTIÉRREZ-PEÑA, E. and SMITH, A. F. M. (1997). Exponential and Bayesian conjugate families: Review and extensions. Test, 6:1-90.
9. KULLBACK, S. (1968). Information Theory and Statistics. Dover Edition, Dover Publications, Mineola, New York.
10. LINDLEY, D. V. (1956). On a measure of information provided by an experiment. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27:986-1005.
11. OSIUS, G. (2000). The association between two random elements: A complete characterization in terms of odds ratios. Math. Arbeitspapiere 53, University of Bremen, Germany. To appear in Metrika.
12. PLUMMER, M. (2002). Discussion of the paper by Spiegelhalter et al. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 64:620-621.
13. SOOFI, E. S. (1994). Capturing the intangible concept of information. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89:1243-1254.
14. SPIEGELHALTER, D. J., BEST, N. G., CARLIN, B. P., and VAN DER LINDE, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 5, 64:583-616.
15. YE, J. (1998). On measuring and correcting the effects of data mining and model selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93:120-131.
16. YE, J. and WONG, W. (1998). Evaluation of highly complex modeling procedures with Binomial and Poisson data. Technical report, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.