Patch testing with Indian standard series

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 281-282

  Narendra, G ^a   Srinivas, C ^a  

^a PSG INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Indian standard series; Patch test allergens

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; CHLOROCRESOL; COBALT CHLORIDE; ETHYLENEDIAMINE; FRAGRANCE; GENTAMICIN; MACROGOL 400; NICKEL SULFATE; NITROFURAL; PROPYLENE GLYCOL; ROSIN;

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

EID: 11144311550     PISSN: 03786323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Mohammed Osman Gad EI-Rod, OmarAbdulazizAl-Sheikh. Is the European stantard series suitable for patch testing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia? Contact Dermatitis 1995;33: 310-314.
2. Castiglioni G, Carosso A, Manzon S, et al. Result of routine patch testing of 834 patients in Turin. Contact Dermatitis 1999;27: 182-185.
3. Hogan DJ, Hill M, Lane PR. Result of routine patch testing of 542 patients in Saskatoon, Canada. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19: 120-124.
4. J TE Lim, CL Goh SK. NG, et al. Changing trends in the epidermiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26: 321-326.
5. George ND, Srinivas CR, Balachandran C, et al. Short communications. Sensitivity to various ingredients of topical preparations following prolonged use. Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:367-368.
6. Pasricha JS, Bharati Guru. Contact hypersensitivity to local antibacterial agents. Indian J Dermatol Venereal Lepr 1981;47: 27-30.