Simulating autonomous coupling in discrimination of light frequencies

Connection Science

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 283-299

  Iizuka, Hiroyuki ^a   Ikegami, Takashi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Autonomous coupling; Dynamical categorization; Embodiment; Evolution

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS COUPLING; DYNAMICAL CATEGORIZATION; EMBODIMENT; EVOLUTION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; FREQUENCIES; FUNCTIONS; NEUROLOGY; OSCILLATIONS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 11144308379     PISSN: 09540091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095400904123314786     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aihara, K., Takabe, T., and Toyoda, M., 1990, Chaotic neural networks. Physics Letters A, 144 (6,7): 333-340.
2. Beer, R. D., 2003, The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior, 11 (4): 209-243.
3. Braitenberg, V., 1984, Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology (Cambridge MA: MIT Press).
4. Di Paolo, E. A., 2000, Homeostatic adaptation to inversion in the visual field and other sensorimotor disruptions. In J. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. H. Floreano, H. Roitblat and S. Wilson (eds) From Animals to Animats VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), pp. 440-449.
5. Gibson, J. J., 1962, Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69: 477-491.
6. lizuka, H., and Ikegami, T., 2004, Adaptability and diversity in simulated turn-taking behaviour. Artificial Life, 10 (4): 361-378.
7. Ikegami, T., 2005, Dynamical categorization and abstract meeting space, to appear in Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 1.
8. Lakoff, G., 1987, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind (Chicago: The Chicago University Press).
9. Madina, D., Ono, N., and Ikegami, T., 2003, Cellular evolution in a 3d lattice artificial chemistry. In W. Banzhaf, T. Christaller, P. Dittrich, J. T. Kim and J. Ziegler (eds) Proceedings of the 7th Eurqopean Conference on Artificial life, Dortmund, Germany, pp. 59-68.
10. Marocco, D., and Floreano, D., 2002, Active vision and feature selection in evolutionary behavioral systems. In B. Hallam, D. Floreano, J. Hallam, G. Hayes and J. A. Meyer (eds) From Animals to Animats VII: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (Cambrige MA: MIT Press), pp. 247-255.
11. McMullin, B., and Varela, F. J., 1997, Rediscovering computational autopoiesis. In P. Husbands and I. Harvery (eds) Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Artificial Life, Brighton, UK, pp. 38-47.
12. Morimoto, G., and Ikegami, T., 2004, Evolution of plastic sensory-motor coupling and dynamic categorization. In J. Pollack, M. Bedav, P. Husbands, T. Ikegami and R. A. Watson (eds) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (ALIFE 9), Boston, USA, pp. 188-193.
13. Nagumo, J., and Sato, S., 1972, On a response characteristic of a mathematical neuron model. Kybernetic, 10: 155-164.
14. Nolfi, S., 2002, Power and limits of reactive agents. Neurocomputing, 49: 119-145.
15. Nolfi, S., and Marocco, D., 2001, Evolving robots able to integrate sensorimotor information over time. Theory in Biosciences, 120: 287-310.
16. Nolfi, S., and Marocco, D., 2002, Active perception: a sensorimotor account of object categorization. In B. Hallam, D. Floreano, J. Hallam, G. Hayes and J. A. Meyer (eds) From Animals to Animats VII: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (Cambrige MA: MIT Press), pp. 266-271.
17. Ono, N., and Ikegami, T., 2000, Self-maintenace and self-reproduction in an abstract cell model. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206: 243-253.
18. O'Regan, J. K., and Noë, A., 2001, A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavior Brain Science, 24: 939-1011.
19. Scheier, C., and Pfeifer, R., 1995, Classification as sensorimotor coordination: a case study on autonomous agents. In F. Morau, A. Moreno, J. J. Merelo and P. Chacon (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Artificial Life, Greneda, Spain, pp. 657-667.
20. Suzuki, K., and Ikegami, T., 2004, Self-repairing and mobility of a simple cell model. In J. Pollack, M. Bedav, P. Husbands, T. Ikegami and R. A. Watson (eds) Proceedings of Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (ALIFE9), Boston, USA, pp. 421-426.
21. Tani, J., and Nolfi, S., 1998, Learning to perceive the world as articulated: an approach for hierarchical learning in sensorimotor systems. In R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J. A. Meyer, and S. W. Wilson, (eds) From Animals to Animats V: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Simulation of Adative Behavior (Cambrige MA: MIT Press), pp. 270-279.
22. Varela, F. J., 1979, Principles of Biological Autonomy. (New York: Elsevier/North-Holland).
23. Varela, F. J., 1992, Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In B. McMullin and N. Murphy (eds) Proceedings of a Workshop on Autopoiesis and Perception, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 4-14.
24. Walter, W. G., 1950, An imitation of life. Scientific American, 182 (5): 42-45.
25. Walter, W. G., 1951, A machine that learns. Scientific American, 185 (2): 60-63.
26. Ziemke, T., and Thieme, M., 2002, Neuromodulation of reactive sensorimotor mappings as a short-term memory mechanism in delayed response tasks. Adaptive Behavior, 10 (3/4): 185-199.