Construction of integral objective function/fitness function of multi-objective/multi-disciplinary optimization

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 567-576

  Zhu, Z Q ^a   Liu, Z ^a   Wang, X L ^a   Yu, R X ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Euler equations; Genetic algorithms; Maxwell equations; Multiobjective multidisciplinary optimization

Indexed keywords

EULER EQUATIONS; FITNESS FUNCTION; INTEGRAL OBJECTIVE FUNCTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE/MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION;

AERODYNAMICS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; TORQUE; VECTORS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 11144290779     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Athan, T. W.; Papalambros, P. Y. (1996): A note on weighted criteria methods for compromise solutions in multi-objective optimization. Engineering optimization, vol. 27, pp. 155-176.
2. Bramanti, A.; Barba, P.; Farina, M.; Savini, A. (2001): A combining response surfaces and evolutionary strategies for multiobjective Pareto-Optimization in Electromagnetics. Int. J of Applied Elect and Mech, vol. 15, pp. 231-236.
3. Das, J.; Dennis, J. E. (1998): Normal boundary intersection: A new method for generating Pareto optimal points in Multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J on optimization, vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 631-657.
4. Goldberg, D. E. (1989): Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, Addison-Wesley.
5. Hager, J. O.; Eyi, S.; Lee, K. D. (1992): Multi-point design of transonic airfoils, using optimization. AIAA 92-4225.
6. Holland, J. H. (1975): Adaption in natural and artificial systems. The University Michigan press.
7. Kasprazak, E. M.; Lewis, K. E. (1999): A method to determine optimal relative weights for Pareto solution sets. Proc. Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMQ-3), C. L. Bloedaum and K. E. Lewis et al, eds., Buffalo, N. Y., University at Buffalo vol. 2, May 17-21, pp. 408-410.
8. Levin, O.; Shyy, W. (2002):Optimization of a Low Reynolds Number Airfoil with Flexible Membrane. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 523-536.
9. Mathur R.; Advani S. G.; Fink B. K. (2003):A Real-Coded Hybrid Genetic Algorithm to Determine Optimal Resin Injection Locations in the Resin Transfer Molding Process. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 587-602
10. Messac, A. (1996): Physical programming: effective optimization for computational design. AIAA J, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 149-158.
11. Messac, A.; Sundararaj, J. G.; Tappeta, R. V.; Renaud, J. E. (2000): Ability of objective functions to generate points on non-convex Pareto frontiers. AIAA J, vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1084-1091.
12. Messac, A.; Melachrinoudis, E.; Sukam, C. P. (2000): Required relationship between aggregate objective functions and Pareto frontiers, with practical implications. Optimization and Engineering J, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 171-188.
13. Messac, A.; Melachrinoudis, E.; Sukam, C. P. (2001): Mathematical and pragmatic perspectives of physical programming. AIAA J, vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 885-893.
14. Mur, G. (1981): Absobing boundary conditions for the finite difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic field equations. IEEE Trans. Elect. Comp, EMC-23 (4): 377-382.
15. Ori, L.; Shyy, W. (2002): Optimization of a Low Reynolds Number Airfoil with Flexible Membrane. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 523-536.
16. Osyczka, A. (1985): Multicriteria optimization for engineering design. In Design optimization, J. S. Gero, ed. Academic Press: New York, 1985, pp. 193-227.
17. Osyczka, A.; Kundu, S. (1995): A new method to solve generalized multicriteria optimization problem using the simple genetic algorithm. Structural Optimization, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 94-99.
18. Powell, M. J. D. (1964): An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculation derivatives. Computer, J. 7: 155-1621964.
19. th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis of optimization, St. Louis, MO. AIAA, vol. 3, Sept. 2-4, pp. 2114-2123.
20. Siikonen, T.; Hofferen, J. (1989): FINFLO: A finite volume based computer program for two dimensional and axisymmetric compressible flow. Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Report No. B-19.
21. Standler, W. (1984): Multicriteria optimization in mechanics (A Survey), Applied mechanics reviews, 37(3): 277-286.
22. Steuer, R. (1986): Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, New York, Wiley.
23. Tapp, C.; Hansel, W.; Mittelstedt, C.; Becker, W. (2004): Weight-Minimization of Sandwich Structures by a Heuristic Topology Optimization Algorithm. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 563-574.
24. Umashankar, K.; Taflove, A. (1982): A novel method to analyze electromagnetic scattering of complex objects. IEEE Trans. Elect. Comp, EMC-24 (4): 405-410.
25. Van leer, B. (1982): Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations. Lect. Notes in physics, 70: 507-512.
26. Wilson, B.; Cappelleri, D.; Simpson, T.; Frecker, M. (2001): Efficient Pareto Frontier Exploration using Surrogate Approximations. Optimization and Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 31-50.
27. Zhang, J.; Wiecek, M. M.; Chen, W. (1999): Local approximation of the efficient frontier in robust design. Advances in design automation, Las Vegas, ASME, Sept. 1-15, No. DETC 99/DCA-8566.
28. Zhu, Z. Q.; Islam, Z.; Zhu, Y. K.; Li, H. M. (1998): The numerical optimization computation of fluid/electromagnetic fields. Comp. Fluid Dyn, J. 7(2): 229-244.
29. Zhu, Z. Q.; Yu, R. X.; Fu, H. Y.; Chen, Y. C. (2003): Numerical biobjective optimal design of airfoil and wing. J. of aircraft, 40 (3): 600-603.