"Facts available" dumping allegations: When will foreign firms cooperate in antidumping petitions?

European Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 185-204

  Moore, Michael O ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antidumping; Dumping margin; Facts available

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144281968     PISSN: 01762680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Antidumping Agreement The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 145-169 United States Government Printing Office Washington, DC
2. Baldwin R.E. Moore M.O. Administration of the unfair trade laws by the Department of Commerce: A political economy analysis Boltuck R. Litan R. "Down in the Dumps": Administration of U.S. Trade Remedy Law 1991 253-280 Brookings Institution Washington, DC
3. Brander J. Krugman P. Reciprocal dumping Journal of International Economics 15 1983 313-324
4. Davies S.W. McGuiness A.J. Dumping at less than marginal cost Journal of International Economics 12 1982 169-182
5. Devault J.M. Economics and the international trade commission Southern Economic Journal 60 1993 463-478
6. Ethier W. Dumping Journal of Political Economy 90 1982 487-506
7. Finger J.M. Artis N. Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt 1993 University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor
8. Finger J.M. Hall H.K. Nelson D. The political economy of administered protection American Economic Review 72 1982 452-466
9. Hansen W. Prusa T. The economics and politics of trade policy: an empirical analysis of ITC decision making Review of International Economics 5 1997 230-245
10. Hartigan J.C. Design of an antidumping law Journal of Economic Integration 15 2000 654-668
11. Hartigan J.C. Endogenous obfuscation in injury investigations Economica 60 2002 502-523
12. Hillman A.L. Katz E. Domestic uncertainty and foreign dumping Canadian Journal of Economics 86 1986 403-416
13. Kohler P. Moore M.O. Injury-based protection with auditing under imperfect information Southern Economic Journal 68 2001 42-59
14. Liebman, B., 2001. Sunset reviews and ITC commissioner voting behavior. Unpublished paper. University of Oregon.
15. Mastel G. Antidumping Laws and the US Economy 1998 M.E. Sharpe Armonk, NY
16. Messerlin P. The EC antidumping regulations: A first economic appraisal, 1980-1985 Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125 1989 563-587
17. Moore M.O. Rules or politics?: An empirical analysis of ITC antidumping decisions Economic Inquiry 30 1992 446-466
18. Moore M.O. Antidumping reform in the US: A faded sunset Journal of World Trade 33 1999 1-17
19. Moore M.O. Department of Commerce administration of antidumping sunset reviews: A first assessment Journal of World Trade 36 2002 675-698
20. Moore M.O. Suranovic S. Lobbying vs. administered protection: endogenous industry choice and welfare Journal of International Economics 32 1992 289-303
21. Murray T. The administration of the antidumping duty law by the Department of Commerce Boltuck R. Litan R. "Down in the Dumps": Administration of U.S. Trade Remedy Law 1991 23-56 Brookings Institution Washington, DC
22. Palmeter N.D. The antidumping law: A legal and administrative nontariff barrier Boltuck R. Litan R. "Down in the Dumps": Administration of U.S. Trade Remedy Law 1991 64-89 Brookings Institution Washington, DC
23. Prusa T. Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn? Journal of International Economics 33 1992 1-20
24. Staiger R. Wolack F. The effect of import source on the determinants and impacts of antidumping suit activity Krueger A.O. The Political Economy of Trade Protection 1996 85-93 University of Chicago Press Chicago
25. Stewart T. Administration of the antidumping law: A different perspective Boltuck R. Litan R. "Down in the Dumps": Administration of U.S. Trade Remedy Law 1991 230-288 Brookings Institution Washington, DC