An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 116, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 3263-3266

  Johnson, Tiffany A ^a   Neely, Stephen T ^a   Dierking, Darcia M ^a   Hoover, Brenda M ^a   Gorga, Michael P ^a  

^a BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; NOISE ABATEMENT; TUNING;

DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION (DPOAE); PSYCHOPHYSICAL TUNING CURVES; SUPPRESSION TUNING CURVES (STC);

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EAR; HEARING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TUNING CURVE;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR NERVE; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 11144280547     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.1815134     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abdala, C. (2001). "Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary levels," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1465-1476.
2. 2) suppression in children with sensorineural hearing loss," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 919-931.
3. Abdala, C., Sininger, Y. S., Ekelid, M., and Zeng, F.-G. (1996). "Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates," Hear. Res. 98, 38-53.
4. ANSI (1996). ANSI S3.6-1996, Specifications for Audiometers (American National Standards Institute, New York).
5. 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man," Hear. Res. 13, 29-37.
6. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Dierking, D. M., Dora, P. A., Hoover, B. M., and Fitzpatrick, D. F. (2003). "Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 263-278.
7. Gorga, M. P., Neely, S. T., Dorn, P. A., and Konrad-Martin, D. (2002). "The use of distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression as an estimate of response growth," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 271-284.
8. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 197-210.
9. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444.
10. Martin, G. K., Jassir, D., Stagner, B. B., and Lonsbury-Martin, B. L. (1998a). "Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 972-983.
11. 1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 1957-1971.
12. 2. II. Findings in humans," Hear. Res. 177, 111-122.
13. Mills, D. M. (1998). "Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 507-523.
14. Neely, S. T., and Liu, Z. (1993). "EMAV: Otoacoustic emission averager," Tech. Memo No. 17, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
15. Pienkowski, M., and Kunov, H. (2001). "Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing thresholds," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1496-1502.
16. 2 in the barn owl," Hear. Res. 123, 183-200.