Anal manometric parameters: Predictors of outcome following anal sphincter repair?

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 115-120

  Gearhart, Susan ^a   Hull, Tracy ^a   Floruta, Crina ^a   Schroeder, Tom ^a   Hammel, Jeff ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

anal physiology; anal sphincter defect; Fecal incontinence; manometry; overlapping sphincteroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION; PUDENDAL NERVE; RANK SUM TEST; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPHINCTEROPLASTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 11144280520     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Nelson R., Norton N., Cautley E., Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 274:1995;559-561
2. Nikiteas N., Korsgen S., Kumar D., Keighley M.R.B. Audit of sphincter repair, factors associated with poor outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;1164-1170
3. Baig M.K., Wexner S.D. Factors predictive of outcome after surgery for faecal incontinence. BJS. 87:2000;1316-1330
4. Halverson A.L., Hull T., Paraiso M., Floruta C. Outcome of sphincteroplasty combined with surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 44:2001;1421-1426
5. Halverson A.L., Hull T.L. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 45:2002;345-347
6. Buie W.D., Lowry A.C., Rothenberger D.A., Madoff R.D. Clinical rather than laboratory assessment predicts continence after anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum. 44:2001;1255-1260
7. Carty N.J., Moran B., Johnson C.D. Anorectal physiology measurements are of no value in clinical practice. True or false? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 76:1994;276-280
8. Chen A.S., Luchtefeld M.A., Senagore A.J., MacKeigan J.M., Hoyt C. Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair? Dis Colon Rectum. 41:1998;1005-1009
9. Liberman H., Faria J., Ternent C.A., Blatchford G.J., Christensen M.A., Thorson A.G. A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 44:2001;1567-1574
10. Sangwan Y.P., Coller J., Barrett R.C., Murray J.J., Roberts P., Schoetz D.J. Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Significance and implications. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;249-251
11. Sangwan Y.P., Coller J.A., Barrett R.C., Roberts P.L., Murray J.J., Rusin L., Schoetz D.J. Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 39:1996;686-689
12. Yip B., Barrett R., Coller J., Marcello P., Murray J., Roberts P., Rusin L., Schoetz D. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing: Assessing the educational learning curve. Dis Colon Rectum. 45:2002;184-187
13. Oliveira L., Pfeifer J., Wexner S.D. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasy. BJS. 83:1996;502-505
14. Ha H.T., Fleshman J.W., Smith M., Read T., Kodner I.J., Birnbaum E.H. Manometric squeeze pressure difference parallels functional outcome after overlapping sphincter reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 44:2001;655-660
15. Church J.M., Saad R., Schroeder T., Fazio V.W., Lavery I.C., Oakley J.R., Milsom J.W., Tuckson W. Predicting the functional result of anastomoses to the anus: The paradox of preoperative anal resting pressure. Dis Colon Rectum. 36:1993;895-900